trium Posted June 1, 2019 Share Posted June 1, 2019 as in winapp2.inis post - google removes the blocking feature in chrome but not for enterprise-installations article in german https://www.golem.de/news/ublock-und-privacy-badger-google-schraenkt-werbeblocker-in-chrome-ein-1906-141627.html Quote 1. Juni 2019, 9:02 Uhr, Moritz Tremmel uBlock und Privacy Badger: Google schränkt Werbeblocker in Chrome ein Google schafft die Grundlage von uBlock Origin, uMatrix und Privacy Badger im Chrome-Browser de facto ab. Nach eigenen Angaben, um die Leistung zu verbessern. Der Mutterkonzern Alphabet nennt Werbeblocker allerdings eine Bedrohung für Googles Geschäftsmodell. Google baut die Schnittstellen und Regelungen für Chrome-Erweiterungen um und behindert damit modernes Tracking- und Werbeblocking. Bereits im Januar wurde der Entwurf für das neue Regelwerk Manifest V3 massiv kritisiert. Google betonte, es handle sich nur um einen Entwurf, nichts sei in Stein gemeißelt. In einem Google-Groups-Post antwortete der Browser-Hersteller auf die Kritik von Entwicklern und Bürgerrechtsorganisationen wie der Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). Es bleibt dabei: "Chrome schafft die Blockierfunktion der webRequest API mit dem Manifest V3 ab, nicht aber die komplette webRequest API (für Enterprise-Installationen wird die Blockierfunktion allerdings weiterhin zur Verfügung stehen)," schreibt der Google-Mitarbeiter Simon Vincent in einem Update zum Manifest V3. Erweiterungen sollen künftig Browseranfragen nur noch lesen, nicht jedoch blockieren, modifizieren oder umleiten können. Genau auf diese Funktionen setzen jedoch etwa die Tracking- und Werbeblocker uBlock Origin, uMatrix und Privacy Badger, um ihre Filterfunktionen zu realisieren. Interessanterweise soll die Funktion jedoch für die Unternehmensversion des Chrome Browsers weiterhin zur Verfügung stehen. Schlechte Alternative Als Alternative soll die declarativeNetRequest API eingeführt werden. Die Filterung der Browseranfragen übernimmt bei dieser Schnittstelle der Browser für die Erweiterung, die keinen Zugriff mehr auf die Anfragen erhält. Mit dieser lassen sich allerdings nach Googles aktuellen Plänen nur 30.000 bis 40.000 Elemente filtern. Allein die weitverbreitete Easylist beinhaltet jedoch schon über 90.000 Elemente. Mit uBlock Origin können mehrere solcher Filterlisten kombiniert werden, mit denen Werbung und Tracking, aber auch Domains mit Schadsoftware einfach ausgefiltert werden können. Auf die Zahlen möchte sich Google jedoch noch nicht verbindlich festlegen. "Wir planen, diese Werte zu erhöhen, aber wir können die Zahlen nicht aktualisieren, solange wir nicht Leistungstests durchgeführt haben, um eine gute Obergrenze zu finden, die auf allen unterstützten Geräten funktioniert", schreibt Vincent. Google sieht Werbeblocker als Geschäftsrisiko an Der Entwickler der Tracking- und Werbeblocker uBlock Origin und uMatrix Raymond Hill (auch bekannt als Gorhill) hält Googles Argumentation für vorgeschoben: "Webseiten laden langsam, weil sie überladen sind und nicht, weil die webRequest API blockiert." Wären wirklich Performanceprobleme der Hintergrund der Entscheidung, könnten die Entwickler auch einfach den Ansatz von Firefox übernehmen. Das Blockieren von Werbung widerspricht direkt dem Geschäftsmodell von Google. Im Jahresbericht an die US-Börsenaufsicht nennt Googles Mutterkonzern Alphabet Werbeblocker als direkte Bedrohung: "Die meisten unserer Google-Einnahmen stammen aus Gebühren, die im Zusammenhang mit der Schaltung von Online-Anzeigen an uns gezahlt wurden. Infolgedessen könnten solche Technologien und Tools unsere Betriebsergebnisse beeinträchtigen." Auch Hill zitiert den Bericht auf Github. Werbe- und Trackingblocker gehören zu den beliebtesten Browser-Erweiterungen, diese habe Google erlauben müssen, um seine Nutzerbasis zu erreichen, sagt Hill. Allein uBlock Origin hat laut dem Chrome Webstore über 10 Millionen Nutzer. "Die Strategie von Google bestand darin, den optimalen Punkt zwischen den beiden Zielen zu finden, die Nutzerbasis von Google Chrome zu vergrößern und zu verhindern, dass Content-Blocker das Unternehmen schädigen." Mit Mozillas Browser Firefox wird uBlock Origin, uMatrix und Privacy Badger auch weiterhin funktionieren. translated with google translation Quote Google restricts ad blocking in Chrome Google de facto abolishes the foundation of uBlock Origin, uMatrix and Privacy Badger in the Chrome browser. According to own data, to improve the performance. The parent company Alphabet calls advertising blocker, however, a threat to Google's business model. Google is rebuilding the interfaces and regulations for Chrome extensions, hampering modern tracking and advertising blocking. Already in January the draft for the new regulations Manifest V3 was massively criticized. Google emphasized that it was just a draft, nothing was set in stone. In a Google Groups post, the browser maker responded to criticism from developers and civil rights organizations such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). It sticks with it: "Chrome abolishes the blocking function of the webRequest API with the manifest V3, but not the complete webRequest API (for enterprise installations the blocking function will remain however still available)," writes the coworker Simon Vincent in an update to the manifesto V3. In the future, extensions will only be able to read browser queries, but not block, modify or redirect them. However, the tracking and ad blockers uBlock Origin, uMatrix and Privacy Badger use these functions to implement their filter functions. Interestingly enough, however, the feature is still available for the enterprise version of the Chrome browser. Bad alternative As an alternative, the declarativeNetRequest API should be introduced. The filtering of the browser requests takes on this interface, the browser for the extension, which no longer receives access to the requests. However, according to Google's current plans, only 30,000 to 40,000 elements can be filtered with this. However, the widespread Easylist already contains over 90,000 elements. UBlock Origin can be combined with several such filter lists, with which advertising and tracking as well as domains with malicious software can be easily filtered out. However, Google does not want to commit itself to the figures yet. "We plan to increase these values, but we can not update the numbers unless we have performed performance tests to find a good upper limit that works on all supported devices," writes Vincent. Google views ad blocking as a business risk Developer of tracking and ad blocking uBlock Origin and uMatrix Raymond Hill (also known as Gorhill) thinks Google's argumentation is "websites are loading slowly because they are overloaded, not because the webRequest API is blocking." If performance issues really were the background of the decision, the developers could simply adopt the approach of Firefox. Blocking advertising directly contradicts Google's business model. In the annual report to the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Google's parent company Alphabet calls ad blocking as a direct threat: "Most of our Google revenue comes from fees paid in connection with delivering online ads to us, and as a result, such technology and tools could drive our operating results compromise. " Hill also cites the report on Github. Advertising and tracking blockers are among the most popular browser extensions, which Google had to allow to reach its user base, says Hill. Only uBlock Origin has over 10 million users, according to the Chrome Webstore. "Google's strategy was to strike the perfect balance between the two goals of increasing the Google Chrome user base and preventing content blockers from harming the company." With Mozilla's Firefox browser, uBlock Origin, uMatrix and Privacy Badger will continue to work. Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted June 7, 2019 Share Posted June 7, 2019 firefox legacy v1.16.4.11 gorhill released this Jun 3, 2019 Change Fix generichide not being evaluated for local context Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 ublock v1.20.0 gorhill released this Jun 14, 2019 Closed as fixed Does not block large media fetched over Fetch API Last permanent rule is marked as changed when rules are added to the bottom Dashboard open from uBO popup triggers unsaved changes dialog Multiple "Advanced settings" opened Redirection fails for filters having * in the host part Show requests blocked in the logger as a result of csp= option Element picker normalize style attrib "#@#+js" entries are shown in the logger as yellow instead of green no-scripting: behind-the-scene false sticks even after restoring uBO from a config where it's not present Revert button remains active/clickable after clicking on Apply changes "Block element" item should have ellipsis (usability) Nested !#if/!#endif directives not evaluated properly Hide predefined whitelist directives Non-specific procedural filters HTML filter showing up as cosmetic filter in logger No warning for unsaved changes in dashboard Logger: can't bring up filtering options for popup entries where URL does not start with http Switching configuration tabs [appears to stop] list updates Cosmetic filter exceptions not displayed in network request logger Commits with no entry in issue tracker Fix generichide not being evaluated for local context Discard whole filter with bad csp= content Add a link to the remote asset in asset viewer Rearrange inner loop of static network filtering engine Fix "Close this window" not working on document-blocked page Add support for all filter option Set default delay for creating selfie to 3 minutes Avoid duplicated strings in filterOrigin w/ new approach Revisit code to benefit from ES6 syntax Refactor runtime storage of specific cosmetic filters Add support for nth-ancestor operator in HTML filtering Ensure "Ignore generic cosmetic filters" sticks on Fennec Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 ublock v1.20.2 gorhill released this Jul 2, 2019 No changes from 1.20.0. This release exists only to fulfill a request by Mozilla that I submit a new version even if there is no code change, so as to test changes on the back-end of AMO. Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 ublock v1.21.0 gorhill released this Jul 18, 2019 New: New procedural cosmetic/HTML filtering operator: min-text-length(x), where x is the minimal text length of the subject DOM element. It is chainable. Example: example.de##^script:has-text(.charCodeAt):min-text-length(14000) New keyboard shortcut available: "Relax blocking mode". Use it to lower the current blocking mode to a lower one. Currently the default behavior is: Allow JavaScript; or Allow 3rd-party network requests Consequently, if your default blocking profile is to disable JavaScript and 3rd-party network requests, you will need to press twice to lower uBO's blocking mode to the lowest blocking mode achievable through the keyboard command. The current web page will be automatically reloaded each time the current blocking mode is lowered. The shortcut will have no effect when the current blocking mode in effect does not forbid JavaScript and 3rd-party requests. Closed as fixed: url(...) style injections in cosmetic filters Parse search string as plaintext to avoid doubling \ Commit button gets stuck under specific circumstances Whitelisting behind-the-scene causes uBO to disregard the moz-extension-scheme rule Add link to open urls in a new tab Thunderbird's 1.20.0 xpi contains version 1.9.15.101 Coalesce common plain filters in a bucket into a single trie Temporary dynamic filters with 3p-script won't save Keyboard shortcut to change modes Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 ublock v1.21.2 gorhill released this Jul 19, 2019 Commits with no entry in issue tracker: Fix thrown exception in onHeadersReceived listener ps: For Chromium version 54 and older, it is necessary to enable "Experimental JavaScript" at chrome://flags/#enable-javascript-harmony. Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted July 22, 2019 Share Posted July 22, 2019 ublock v1.21.4 gorhill released this Jul 22, 2019 This is an emergency fix for Chromium-based browsers only. The Firefox version won't be updated to 1.21.4. Remove fix to #3639 Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted July 23, 2019 Author Moderators Share Posted July 23, 2019 Thanks for info trium Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 my pleasure :-) nothing to thanks, but thank you hazelnut :-) Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted July 30, 2019 Share Posted July 30, 2019 ublock v1.21.6 gorhill released this Jul 23, 2019 This is an emergency fix for Chromium-based browsers only, version 57 and earlier. The Firefox version won't be updated to 1.21.6. uBlock Origin broken on Chrome 57 Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramkun5591 Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 On 2019/7/31 at 03:36, trium said: ublock v1.21.6 This is an emergency fix for Chromium-based browsers only, version 57 and earlier. The Firefox version won't be updated to 1.21.6. uBlock Origin broken on Chrome 57 Are you sure the Firefox version won't be updated to 1.21.6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted August 5, 2019 Share Posted August 5, 2019 if gorhill it mean i believe it :-) i have another ff-version in usage and an older ublock installed Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted August 22, 2019 Share Posted August 22, 2019 ublock v1.21.8 gorhill released this Aug 18, 2019 This is a release for Opera-based browsers only. Add "Relax blocking mode" command to Opera manifest Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted August 30, 2019 Share Posted August 30, 2019 ublock v1.22.0 gorhill released this Aug 30, 2019 New Toolbar icon badge color The toolbar icon badge color will now reflect the current blocking mode. This should help with usage of the "Relax blocking mode" shortcut. The way uBO relaxes the current blocking mode is configurable through the advanced setting blockingProfiles. Static network filter options redirect-rule= This new option allows to create a pure redirect directive, without a corresponding block filter as would be the case with the redirect= option. For example, consider the following filter: ||example.com/ads.js$script,redirect=noop.js The above filter will result in a block filter ||example.com/ads.js$script and a matching redirect directive. Now consider this following filter: ||example.com/ads.js$script,redirect-rule=noop.js The above filter will not cause a block filter to be created, only a redirect directive will be created. Standalone redirect directives are useful when the blocking of a resource is optional but we still want the resource to be redirected should it ever be blocked by whatever mean -- whether through a separate block filter, a dynamic filtering rule, etc. empty and mp4 Support for AdGuard's empty and mp4 filter option has been added. !#if false ... !#endif Support for the directive !#if false to easily disable a block of filters, which is more convenient than having to delete them all or prefix them all with !. Scriptlet injection Ability to wholly disable scriptlet injection for a given site using broad scriptlet injection exception: example.com#@#+js() It is also possible to disable scriptlet injection everywhere with a generic exception: #@#+js() This is useful when creating specific exception filters is inconvenient. Closed as fixed: Support AdGuard's empty & mp4 static filter options Add ability to bypass browser cache when fetching a resource Extension icon doesn't revert back when the domain is removed from Whitelist tab Dead code in assets.js Popup panel closing when forcing a reload uBlock does not appear to honor overriding default assets.json via Chrome policy uBo logger show not used :style(...) filters Block Element doesn't appear in the context menu of a tab under specific circumstances Cosmetic filters containing pseudo-elements do not show results in manual/interactive selection mode Commits with no entry in issue tracker: Add support for !#if false in list directive processor Code review fix re. max string length in bidi-trie Add two scriptlets: setTimeout-if and setInterval-if Fix badly computed output size in µBlock.base64.encode() Add new scriptlet to defuse calls to requestAnimationFrame Add support for special exception filter #@#+js() Add ability to escape comma in a scriptlet's list of arguments Review icon badge color management Reflect blocking mode in badge color of toolbar icon Invalidate browser's memory cache after using element picker Add virtuous signal that remote code execution in extension context is not possible Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted September 13, 2019 Share Posted September 13, 2019 ublock v1.22.2 gorhill released this Sep 7, 2019 Emergency fix in ac7825c: redirection rules could be ignored under some circumstances. Regression from 3e5c9e0. Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted September 26, 2019 Share Posted September 26, 2019 ublock v1.22.4 gorhill released this Sep 26, 2019 This is an emergency fix. The issue was fixed in dev build days ago, and it was originally deemed to not be a serious regression. However as reported by a user on Reddit, the issue was affecting more than just the logging of cosmetic filters, it was completely breaking cosmetic filtering when the two following conditions were met: uBO's own logger was opened; AND Procedural cosmetic filters were injected on the page. Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted October 12, 2019 Author Moderators Share Posted October 12, 2019 Soon Chrome users may not be able to use uBlock Origin as Chrome Web Store keeps refusing the builds with 'odd' reasons. https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/745 Read the posts, it doesn't sound good Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted October 12, 2019 Share Posted October 12, 2019 ... yes, not good. perhaps one little step from rejected developer-version to "normal"version in the near future? i dont see the pre-realese-notes to the developer-versions since pre-release v1.22.5rc2 Quote Notes: Latest Chromium dev builds of uBO are no longer available in the Chrome Web Store, as 1.22.5rc1 has been marked "REJECTED" by the Chrome Web Store. but i personally dont use the developer-version - its marked as "pre-release" and i used only the "latest-release" Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Andavari Posted October 12, 2019 Moderators Share Posted October 12, 2019 9 hours ago, hazelnut said: Soon Chrome users may not be able to use uBlock Origin as Chrome Web Store keeps refusing the builds with 'odd' reasons. https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/745 Read the posts, it doesn't sound good I compile my own from the downloaded ZIP, been doing so ever since that buggy release from a year or so ago only crashed and we were without a fix for nearly a week, I don't have to deal with that ever again. If doing your own compile it helps to just keep PEM file "uBlock0.chromium.pem" in the downloads folder as I've found out. And a user compiled version can only be used on the exact same computer it was compiled on, i.e.; hardware I.D. locked. Note: Chromium/Chrome can pack/compile the extension for you, it's easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted October 13, 2019 Author Moderators Share Posted October 13, 2019 I can see a lot of folk switching to a non-Chrome browser if it means that's the only way they can block some ads. Blocking ads is of course the reason why Chrome don't want uBlock0 on people's machines, Chrome will lose advertising fees. Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted October 13, 2019 Author Moderators Share Posted October 13, 2019 25 minutes ago, hazelnut said: I can see a lot of folk switching to a non-Chrome browser if it means that's the only way they can block some ads. Blocking ads is of course the reason why Chrome don't want uBlock0 on people's machines, Chrome will lose advertising fees. Late edit.. Looks like the pressure has made Chrome extentions devs change their minds. https://www.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/dgoymg/warning_ubo_ublock_origin_will_possibly_be/f3fwlto/ Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Andavari Posted October 13, 2019 Moderators Share Posted October 13, 2019 Not only the Chrome browser, I'd image Chromebooks wouldn't be much of an alternative to traditional Mac and Windows laptops if people couldn't block ads, and Android tablets as well. I had thought of a Chromebook earlier this year just for my daily YouTube consumption, but with the press revealing Google's soon anti-adblock attitude I never gave a Chromebook another thought. With a good router and even some modems ads can be blocked that way via hardware, although it's not as configurable as something like uBlock Origin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted October 13, 2019 Share Posted October 13, 2019 13 hours ago, hazelnut said: Late edit.. Looks like the pressure has made Chrome extentions devs change their minds. https://www.reddit.com/r/chrome/comments/dgoymg/warning_ubo_ublock_origin_will_possibly_be/f3fwlto/ thanks for this good news hazelnut :-) Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted November 3, 2019 Share Posted November 3, 2019 ublock v1.23.0 gorhill released this Oct 21, 2019 New: Static filter option elemhide as per ABP semantic The elemhide option is now fully supported, rather than being an alias of generichide. The elemhide option will be internally converted into two filters, generichide and specifichide. There have been cases raised by filter list maintainers where specifichide would be useful. Additionally, the filter options elemhide, generichide and specifichide can be aliased with ehide, ghide and shide respectively. (generichide appears over 1,300 times just in "uBlock filters".) Closed as fixed: Prevent uBO from being reloaded mid-session A new advanced setting -- extensionUpdateForceReload -- can be used to override this new behavior. Comply with new security requirements for Chrome The changes benefit all platforms. Add advanced setting to control logger popup type Ignoring ping filters Commits with no entry in issue tracker: Fix bad returned value in case of empty URL Avoid or defer writing back to cache storage at launch Do not bypass network listener in suspended mode Remove stats button from logger Log procedural cosmetic exception filters Prevent reverse-lookup from finding badfilter-ed filters Reduce memory usage in staticExtFilteringEngine.HostnameBasedDB Store csp= filters into main data structure Add ability to quickly create exceptions in logger Match static popup filter against local context Fix erroneous reports of blocked popups in logger Fix case of unreported :style filters in logger Do not flush blocked-elements cache at webNavigation time Remove remnants of chrome references Add support for elemhide (through specifichide) Simplify client messaging code Removing now obsolete Safari code base Revisit element picker arguments code Convert new setTimeout-if scriptlet to blacklist approach Work toward modernizing code base: promisification Fix icon title always showing (0) when badge is disabled Reuse existing Set/Map when calling scriptletFilteringEngine.retrieve Fix entity-based lookup in html & scriptlet filtering Coalesce tab reloads in burst "relax blocking mode" ops Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trium Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 ublock v1.24.0 gorhill released this Nov 18, 2019 Changes: The badge for the cosmetic filtering switch in the popup panel has been revisited so that it will from now on be evaluated on-demand only, which occurs when hovering the mouse cursor over the cosmetic filtering switch: Closed as fixed: report-uri / report-to rejector RegExp is broken global onMouseDown handler doesn’t handle SVG links Regression: tabs created by user are closed by popup filter Switch filter inputs to type="search" Performance of the per-site switches counters Expand bidi-trie code to hold more types of filters Block element preview window overlays object to be blocked Notable commits with no entry in issue tracker: Save magic compiled/selfie format values in cache storage Support keyboard shortcut to open popup panel Use request as its own context when none available Versions of CCleaner Cloud; Introduction Ccleaner Cloud; Ccleaner-->System-Requirements; Ccleaner FAQ´s; Ccleaner builds; Scheduling Ccleaner Free Es ist möglich, keine Fehler zu machen und dennoch zu verlieren. Das ist kein Zeichen von Schwäche. Das ist das Leben -> "Picard" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now