Moderators Andavari Posted June 28, 2013 Moderators Share Posted June 28, 2013 There was a mockup for a dark australis theme set to become the private mode theme I usually don't like dark themes (browsers, OS, software, etc.,), however that one looks really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 I would love to see it become a reality. I'll update if it ever lands in the ux or nightly branches. Also, beta changelogs are up, aurora is still missing. winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDPower Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Does australis still allow the tabs to be at the top of the web page or are they now forced to the top of the browser? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Tabs on bottom is actually disabled in Nightly or Aurora now I think. winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDPower Posted June 28, 2013 Share Posted June 28, 2013 Tabs on bottom is actually disabled in Nightly or Aurora now I think. Damn. Give with one hand and take with the other lol. Fingers crossed there'll be a mod or extension to sort that by the time it's released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted June 29, 2013 Share Posted June 29, 2013 It might only be disabled in UX, I personally keep my tabs in the titlebar (screen real estate!) using an addon, so tabs on bottom is disabled for me. winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted June 30, 2013 Share Posted June 30, 2013 I'm now maintaining Nightly Change threads over at Mozillazine! http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2724227 winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted July 10, 2013 Share Posted July 10, 2013 (edited) New cache system for firefox being played with, builds available for testing on the page. Seems to just make a 'cache2' folder and do its business in there, not sure how this will affect CCleaner (if it ever lands on stable....) Edit: A recent nightly changed the look of the in-page find bar new: old: Edit: Also seems the find bar will be moved to the top https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=869543 Edited July 12, 2013 by Winapp2.ini winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 Firefox 23 Release Notes (2013-08-06) Release: http://www.mozilla.o...0/releasenotes/ Beta: http://www.mozilla.o...a/releasenotes/ Aurora: http://www.mozilla.o...a2/auroranotes/ winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Nergal Posted September 6, 2013 Moderators Share Posted September 6, 2013 @Winapp2.ini is the highlighted area all Firefox or just mobile? If all (edit that's why you pay attention when using Swype™) so is that why ccleaner was causing some people issues? ADVICE FOR USING CCleaner'S REGISTRY INTEGRITY SECTION DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF. Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark) ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T. Support at https://support.ccleaner.com/s/?language=en_US Pro users file a PRIORITY SUPPORT via email support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted September 7, 2013 Share Posted September 7, 2013 AFAIK that's just a mobile setting. The direction Firefox Desktop has been heading, they're more likely to cut out options (see: advanced js options, etc) than add them winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Nergal Posted September 7, 2013 Moderators Share Posted September 7, 2013 Sorry, I think I was unclear. I meant the bug in local storage pre version 23. The option is from a add-on ADVICE FOR USING CCleaner'S REGISTRY INTEGRITY SECTION DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF. Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark) ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T. Support at https://support.ccleaner.com/s/?language=en_US Pro users file a PRIORITY SUPPORT via email support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 oh, perhaps. I've been doing the nightly change threads for 2 months now, so I don't really recall each change (Over three thousand individual ones so far) winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted September 17, 2013 Share Posted September 17, 2013 Fx 24 released today 24: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/24.0/releasenotes/ 25 beta: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/25.0beta/releasenotes/ (not up yet) 26 aurora: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/26.0a2/auroranotes/ (not up yet) winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 Beta/Aurora notes are up. Btw you can try the new http cache backend builds by downloading from the gum tree https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Gum winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted October 3, 2013 Share Posted October 3, 2013 notable landings this week: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=885477 move nightly users to Balrog (Balrog is the new backend updater - pretty sure it's something server side but i don't know the implications) https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904346 Add SWF support to Firefox with Shumway winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 http://www.getaustralis.com/ On Australis, the upcoming UI shift for firefox winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDPower Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 http://www.getaustralis.com/ On Australis, the upcoming UI shift for firefox Oh geez, it's looking increasingly Metro-esque. Is it just me that's sick of every website and software going down the ultra dumbed down flat big button route Oh and does the dark theme properly exist yet or has it been dropped? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators mta Posted October 8, 2013 Moderators Share Posted October 8, 2013 Looks more like Opera's Speed Dial to me. They say Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. I don't mind the metro style but it would be nice to have a classic skin option to keep everyone happy. Backup now & backup often.It's your digital life - protect it with a backup.Three things are certain; Birth, Death and loss of data. You control the last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDPower Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 I don't mind the metro style but it would be nice to have a classic skin option to keep everyone happy. Oh I don't mind them changing it (much), just wish developers would have a little originality instead of, en masse, following the crowd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Oh and does the dark theme properly exist yet or has it been dropped? No info on that but I'll do some digging. Ux isn't actually metro-ish imo.. looks more like the current Chrome for windows interface (don't tell the developers that.. they'll tell you Australis has CURVES and chrome has ANGLES!) I actually think it looks nice but they've gutted a lot of functionality and customization and a lot of users are upset. I'll post some screenshots from the ux build later winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWebAtom Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 In my opinion, they haven't gutted enough. Decisions, not option. Relevant op-ed from a Mozilla developer: http://limi.net/checkboxes-that-kill/ I'm Shane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winapp2.ini Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 Not so far as options, Shane, at least not in so many words. They've merged the back/forward buttons to the URL bar and bound the favorites star to it as well - both changes many who customize the ui aren't fond of. They've disabled tabs on bottom, among other things as well. JDPower: I've asked on MozillaZine and the consensus is that it never got passed mockup stages, but that it also wouldn't be difficult to implement as a theme. winapp2.ini additions thread winapp2.ini github Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWebAtom Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 They've disabled tabs on bottom Excellent. Only one interface region needs to be capable of housing the tabs. Less code, more performance. Also saves time, as they don't need to do QA and unit testing for both interface variations. They've merged the back/forward buttons to the URL bar and bound the favorites star to it as well. I think the number of people who actually customized this would be pretty small. I'd also wager the majority of the group are capable of installing an extension that would revert those changes. That's the benefit of a rich, extensible API: you don't need to include a thousand different customization options. From a developer's standpoint, we power users are the worst. I'm Shane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDPower Posted October 8, 2013 Share Posted October 8, 2013 JDPower: I've asked on MozillaZine and the consensus is that it never got passed mockup stages, but that it also wouldn't be difficult to implement as a theme. Thanks greatly for checking, hopefully someone will pick it up and run with it as a theme. I've not bothered with themes for a couple of years (with the exception of a Persona theme), but that I WOULD use! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now