Jump to content
CCleaner Community Forums
LudoA

what random read speed results is everyone seeing using 'Benchmark Drive'?

Recommended Posts

I was wondering what kind of random read speed others are seeing when executing 'Benchmark Drive'?

 

For me, the result is 1.30MB/s (with 19% fragmentation). This is awful of course, but I have no idea how Defraggler does the random read speed test, so maybe results are low for a lot of people.

Anyway, as such a number on itself doesn't say a lot without numbers to compare it to, I thought it'd be interesting if others posted their read speed as well, and the disk they're getting the results on.

 

This is on a Seagate ST9320423AS (a Momentus 7200.4 SATA 3Gb/s 320-GB disk), Windows 7 and version 2.08.373 of Defraggler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a Seagate ST310005 24AS SATA 1,000,204,886,016 bytes (931.51339 gigabytes) I show three successive readings: 16.67, 16.35, 16.29 MB/s with 1% frag excluding restore points and hibernates.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On a Benchmark icon, I get a Random Read Speed of 32.90MB/s ? On a ST3250 HD, SATA/300 Win XP Home Duo core Intel..... I'm not sure I understand what the Benchmark does?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have a pair of Seagate Barracuda 1000GB drives SATA II,

Both drives showed apparently slow figures of 3 - 5MB/s but following defrag figures for both moved up to 50 to 70MB/s.

 

Must admit I was intrigued more by how the DF (command line defrag) seems so much faster that the GUI version at carrying out a defrag, but then thats a different topic..

 

JonC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was right after a File Defrag, so there was 0% fragmentation (excluding restore points and hibernates)... Lenovo T410 laptop, Intel i7, 8GB, Win7 Pro x64 SP1, Hitachi Travelstar 7K500 HTS725032A9A364, 320GB SATA.

 

Benchmark - 87.61 MB/s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am observing inconsistencies between an initial benchmark and subsequent executions.  When opening Defraggler a benchmark is executed and the RRS (Random Read Speed) is 11.38 MB/s but the following five executions are an avg. of 17 MB/s.  1)  Why is there such a difference between the initial and any proceeding, and 2) why does the group of executions after the initial never have a dip like the initial?

 

Thank you.

 

Fellow Fraggler

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...