Jump to content

Opera highly critical flaw


Aethec

Recommended Posts

They wanted the ballot screen, and now they published an unfinished product because of it. How ironic. :)

 

Just the beginning to. Both Opera and Firefox are going to shoot themselves in the head in their pursuit of market share. They both need to just ignore Chrome and continue what they were doing. If they continue to chase Chrome they will regret it. They are losing focus of what made them great browsers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it how they use the phrase "untrusted Web sites" I guess they're referring to porn sites and places to download illegally cracked commercial software right?? 24.gif

 

There are still 3 things you can do:

a) run Opera inside a guest account that way even if the exploit was used it would be self-contained inside the account.

b) use SandboxIE and launch Opera as a sandboxed process.

c) bite the bullet and install Mozilla Firefox. :D

 

Richard S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a) run Opera inside a guest account that way even if the exploit was used it would be self-contained inside the account.

b) use SandboxIE and launch Opera as a sandboxed process.

c) bite the bullet and install Mozilla Firefox. :D

Isn't browsing using a "private tab" fairly secure as well?

Dell Latitude D600

Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit SP1

 

follow_me-c.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't browsing using a "private tab" fairly secure as well?

No (assuming it's akin to IE's private browsing). It doesn't prevent malicious content from being downloaded. All that it does is to stop content (e.g. cookies, history and temporary internet files) being stored on the hard drive - it's more of a privacy thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Teejay don't you think that most folk would have realised it was a theoretical security issue when they worked out that..

 

A value in the range is 263 to 264-1 was returned as a valid number, despite being outside the signed data-range of the compiler provided conversion function (so it should have triggered an error instead), and as a result a negative value was returned in the range -263 to -1.

 

I know I did :rolleyes: (as if!!)

 

Support contact

https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general

or

support@ccleaner.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.