fireryone Posted June 3, 2009 Share Posted June 3, 2009 hmm here's a recent AV roundup Interesting read and even AntiVir gets the top spot in the free category. "Tom" even compare whats left over after an uninstall and the % of time added to start-up http://www.tomsguide.com/us/2009-antivirus...eview-1315.html It's time for Tom’s Guide to give you a complete guide to the best anti-virus offerings on the market, including commercial and freeware alternatives. Anti-virus software has become a tool that you just can’t live without as it’s used everyday on every PC (or it should be). There are many kinds of software available, all of which different companies make with different price tags. Faced this wide range of possibilities, the non-professional user can often feel lost due to a lack of reliable information with which he or she can make intelligent purchasing decisions. To help you out, we testes the latest versions of the 15 most used anti-virus offerings: Kaspersky, Panda, McAfee, Comodo, Norton, Trend Micro Pc-Cillin, Avira Antivir, Bit Defender, G-Data Total Care, Eset Smart Security, AVG, Clamwin, F-Secure, and Avast! Home Edition. fireryone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abu aufa Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 hmm here's a recent AV roundup Interesting read and even AntiVir gets the top spot in the free category. "Tom" even compare whats left over after an uninstall and the % of time added to start-up http://www.tomsguide.com/us/2009-antivirus...eview-1315.html No wonder, Avira still the best free AV I've been thinking to switch Avast to G-DATA.It's another best detection AV ( paid version ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishan_rulz Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 I'm waiting for AV-Comparative's reports. Seems like they've gone into major hibernation Simplicity is hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted June 4, 2009 Moderators Share Posted June 4, 2009 Do you mean these just published? A week or two early. http://www.av-comparatives.org/ Click on the main comparatives link. Please note they have requested no linking to the actually documentation. No problem, just read it. Microsoft and Avira did well. Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators rridgely Posted June 4, 2009 Moderators Share Posted June 4, 2009 I cant trust any site that comes to the conclusion that mcafee is anything but junk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishan_rulz Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 Do you mean these just published? A week or two early. http://www.av-comparatives.org/ Click on the main comparatives link. Please note they have requested no linking to the actually documentation. No problem, just read it. Microsoft and Avira did well. Why in the world are they using ESET 3? That totally sucks..! Simplicity is hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators hazelnut Posted June 4, 2009 Moderators Share Posted June 4, 2009 Perhaps because version 4 wasn't released until March and these results are based on February versions. ,e.g it was Avira 8's results also, as version 9 wasn't out then. Support contact https://support.ccleaner.com/s/contact-form?language=en_US&form=general or support@ccleaner.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abu aufa Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 Why in the world are they using ESET 3? That totally sucks..! ESET keep my old PC clean,guy They have also good detections rate ,referring AV-Comparatives.org. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishan_rulz Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 ESET keep my old PC clean,guy They have also good detections rate ,referring AV-Comparatives.org. Lol, you got me wrong!. They should use ESET 4!! Simplicity is hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishan_rulz Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 Perhaps because version 4 wasn't released until March and these results are based on February versions. ,e.g it was Avira 8's results also, as version 9 wasn't out then. Okay, makes sense. But this is a pretty stupid thing for them. These guys are highly reputed. They should keep us 'updated' Simplicity is hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abu aufa Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 Okay, makes sense. But this is a pretty stupid thing for them. These guys are highly reputed. They should keep us 'updated' Already You should regularly visit their site every three months for Main Tests Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now