Jump to content
CCleaner Community Forums
slowday444

New JkDefrag

Recommended Posts

As long Emro is contributing to these forums, would he be so kind as to inform us if the 0.8 GUI could safely be used with JKdefrag version 3.16?

I see that your upcoming version 0.9 has been upgraded to 3.16, but since it's only a front end for the exe file, would it still be safe to use 3.16 or should we continue to use 3.15?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
As long Emro is contributing to these forums, would he be so kind as to inform us if the 0.8 GUI could safely be used with JKdefrag version 3.16?

I see that your upcoming version 0.9 has been upgraded to 3.16, but since it's only a front end for the exe file, would it still be safe to use 3.16 or should we continue to use 3.15?

Apologies for butting in but should work absolutely fine, there were no feature additions between 3.15 and 3.16 so shouldn't have any effect on the GUI.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a test I tried in a virtual machine.Slim install of XP pro with no pagefile present.

 

JK is only slightly faster and that's all I have to say atm.

 

Before any defrag.

 

 

After JK defrag.

 

 

After Perfectdisk 7 smart placement defrag.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...