maki

The software is very, very slow compared to other tools. How to quickly recover a folder / file on a large disk? It takes too long ... I do not want to pay for other programs. I want to do it in the Recuva program. Z:\Test \111.txt For example, for comparison: Undelete tool - a few minutes (scanning time) SUPER FASTER SCAN Recuva - many hours !!! (scan time) (not deep scan !)

Close the program after defragmentation or shutdown after defragmentation DID NOT WORK

The application does not respond (freeze) if I click on the partition letters in the main window. So it never works correctly. Tested on many computers and always with the same problem so this is a bug in the application (!!!) How to enable debugging and application error logging? Windows 7 Latest version Degraggler x64 I see that it is not a paid, professional tool, which in most cases works badly and this confirms so many users on the forum. It is simply amateur. This tool does not work well, it's just very bad, and I come to the conclusion that it will always and will not believe anyone recommending this software as a good tool because it simply is not.

If HDD disk defragmentation (as a data stored) lasts all day and there is still no end, this is a task that does not make sense. Tested on multiple HDD. 3 days (72 hours) defragment progress only 6%? You can not defraggler any large file in Defraggler. The operation can not be completed. If you use a different tool, it lasts for a whole week and is also endless. Example: 1 file - 16,000 fragment -> it takes defragmentation 1 hour!!! 100000 file x 1 hour = 4 166.66667 days

Defragmentation aimless? It defrag the disk, and in a moment the next and subsequent fragments and each time the defragmentation takes hours, days (depending on the number of fragments and the size of the files). What to do to ensure that the fragments do not appear, is there any intelligent record that eliminates real-time I / O fragments? Defragmentation is an important thing only in the case of data recovery, in the speed - it is better not to run the defragmenter because the disk mechanics' wear will be higher and the disk life will be shorter.

Normal mode, it is pointless to defragment in safe mode. Full defragmenting of files does not work. It has been, is and will continue until the developer improves the tool. For comparison - other defragmenters can easily defragment those files, which unsuccessfully in Defraggler.

--------------------------- Pirragorm Defraggler --------------------------- Defragmentation Canceled. Some of the files were not defragmented. The operation can not be completed. --------------------------- OK --------------------------- can never fully defragment: a) if the file is large (Example: 900 MB) b ) if the file contains a lot of fragments (Example 7000 fragment) Example file format *.WAV This problem occurs in every version, for many, many long years and has never been solved. The partition contains a lot of free space (90+ GB), so it's not a problem. The files are not used, so this is not the main reason for the problem.

Defraggler uses 7GB or more of RAM and crashes. Bug all version (!!!) Defragler. Windows 7 64-bit

Suggesion - fan speed RPM graphics card

I had to interrupt analysis (to avoid damage to the MFT and my data) using too much RAM High Memory Leak | Heap Corruption 14 GB (Peak 20 GB) Too many requests on a single disk SsdOptimizer::TriggerTrim#273 Trim Failed with windows error 998 1 FindResourceNameFromOrdinal::FindResourceIdFromOrdinal::BeginSearching#104 EnumResourceNames failed (hr=0x80073b02) Wow64FsRedirectorDisabler::Acquire#50 Wow64DisableWow64FsRedirection failed with error code: 0x80070001. [2015-12-26] [09:42:02.865] 0170c 1 CAnalysis::AnalyzeVolume#60 Flushing volume Disk E - Z failed with error code 0x80070005. OpenGlobalEvent#450 Failed to open existing event: G (error: 0x2) 1 CProgramInstanceMonitorHelper::GetTaskScheduleMutex#79 Failed to open mutex Global\DefragglerTS (code 0x2) CAnalysis::GetFileFragmentsAndSize#424 ERROR: failed to retrieve file size! (err.code() is 81126192 for file "X:\$Secure") [2015-12-26] [09:59:32.335] 018dc 1 CAnalysis::GetFileFragmentsAndSize#424 ERROR: failed to retrieve file size! (err.code() is 81126192 for file "X:\$Extend\$Quota") [2015-12-26] [09:59:32.335] 018dc 1 CAnalysis::GetFileFragmentsAndSize#424 ERROR: failed to retrieve file size! (err.code() is 81126192 for file "X:\$Extend\$ObjId") [2015-12-26] [09:59:32.335] 018dc 1 CAnalysis::GetFileFragmentsAndSize#424 ERROR: failed to retrieve file size! (err.code() is 81126192 for file "X:\$Extend\$Reparse") [2015-12-26] [09:59:36.998] 018dc 1 CAnalysis::GetFileFragmentsAndSize#424 ERROR: failed to retrieve file size! (err.code() is 81126192 for file "X:\$Extend\$UsnJrnl")

Willy2 - and everything in the topic. If you do not know what it means, it's not my business!

Support Team Deveoper - Optimize all => My suggestion: Add an option or build into feature: uses 1 thread per disk on scanning! -> Avoiding high consumption/usage of RAM or leaks!!! GOOD (Example tool with a good optimization: O&O Defrag) Example: HDD1 (4 disk) 1 thread per disk on scanning! HDD2 (4 disk) 1 thread per disk on scanning! HDD3 (8 disk) 1 thread per disk on scanning! HDD4 (8 disk) 1 thread per disk on scanning! HDD5 (6 disk) 1 thread per disk on scanning! Note: disk = partition VERY BAD SITUATION (Example Tool Bad Optimization: Defraggler Fre & Pro | RAXCO PerfectDisk ) HDD1 (4 disk) 4 thread per disk on scanning! HDD2 (4 disk) 4 thread per disk on scanning! HDD3 (8 disk) 8 thread per disk on scanning! HDD4 (8 disk) 8 thread per disk on scanning! HDD5 (6 disk) 6 thread per disk on scanning!

Augeaus - Defraggler64.exe!boost::serialization::singleton<BreakpadWrapper>::get_instance+0x191414 ntdll.dll!Rt|ValidateHeap+0x150 An Error Occured caused by: HeapCorruption Validates the specified heap. The function scans all the memory blocks in the heap and verifies that the heap control structures maintained by the heap manager are in a consistent state. You can also use the HeapValidate function to validate a single memory block within a specified heap without checking the validity of the entire heap.

It is a big defect Defflagler. Therefore, I use the other "better tools" with unique technologists with guaranteed 0% Fragmented - even if disk space is 5% (or even less !!!) 500GB HDD (5% = 25 GB) However, it can successfully work defrag of up to 10 GB (2%) of free space to complete the operation The unique technology is able to defragment system files $MFT and other system files (Even in the mode Windows (WITHOUT RESTART)) and prevent again defragmentation.

I tested a lot of tools to defragment, and I detected a lot of different bugs and memory leaks. I have several Debugger-Tools to analyze bugs and memory leaks. The program(PcWinTech's "Cleanmem | Rizonesoft Memory Booster." does not repair crash application Defraggler. Crash - Always! Bug - for many, many years ... They should fix Developers.