molitar
-
Posts
83 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by molitar
-
-
So I went to add a folder and I can't read the options at all!
-
This install keeps trying to install but always fails. This has been an ongoing problem and is really starting to get old. When is this going to stop reporting errors when I do the health option?
-
It keeps reporting Google Backup and Sync out of date but I do not even have it installed. I even did a registry scan and no Backup and Sync located in Registry. So a false positive.
-
Same problem here.. I have had well over 200 now of same type of emails. 3 batches so far I have deleted.
-
I went into BIOS and checked my cpu temperature and it was at 54 degrees Celsius but Speccy reporting it as 108 degrees Celsius.
Windows 10
ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (AM4)
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Eight-Core Processor
-
I personally quit using CCleaner to clean clients systems as it no longer looks professional but looks like something an 8 year old drew up on paper. Heck probably is. I also wear glasses and this awful awful GUI makes it an eye strain to try to look at. Gave up on it.
-
New look remains crap and makes me remain with 4.19 where it was a PROFESSIONAL software and not crapware that the new UI is!
-
Insults aside, one argument in favor of the apparently much-hated flat style of today is that it's "calmer" and easier on the eyes. I've always felt fancy 3D effects, glass, etc to make my desktop look very busy and stressful, while the flat style is less intrusive. Secondly, the flat style reminds me of pictograms, the point of which is to be simple to understand, universal and obvious.
Once again, I'm only speaking about the flat style here, not the fact that the new UI has custom element and window decoration. Things like buttons and windows should always be rendered according to the host OS, not with some custom style. People using Win7 then get their glossy stuff and people with Win8 get their flat style. Everyone happy and less work for the devs.
If you want your glossy stuff, then stick to Win7, you're not missing anything. 8 is just 7 with new visuals. Stop bashing something you don't need to care about. If Piriform hadn't gone down the path of using custom UI skins, none of us would be here. They should just stick to standards and let the OS draw the UI as per its own settings, then everyone gets what they want.
Maybe calmer to you on the eyes but my mother does not have good vision and trying to TELL WHERE THE D@MN BUTTON IS ON A FLAT! Is not easier on the eyes but very stressful!
-
I think these threads speak for themselves.. not a single thread have I seen a single developer feedback on the UGLY of the new UI. Since that means version 4 will be absolete soon I am hoping that Bleachbit gets the White list in for Cookies and I will not look back. When developers won't even comment in the thread about the opinions from users they are basically saying we are nothing but CRAP in there eyes and they don't care about the users at all.
I have abandoned ship from several apps already where the companies have done this and looks like CCleaner will be another in my growing list of Apps I will no longer use or recommend to anyone. The original UI was a very professional and clean looking UI the new one is crap that reminds me of adware and malware interfaces.
I like how the numbers shown are only for these forums.. there is many sites out there with users that say the interface is UGLY.
http://www.ghacks.net/2014/11/15/first-look-at-ccleaner-5-0s-new-interface/
http://download.cnet.com/CCleaner/
http://www.davescomputertips.com/ccleaner-new-version-new-look/
http://en.community.dell.com/support-forums/virus-spyware/f/3522/t/19608183?pi31449=2
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29669309-BETA-CCleaner-v5.0-is-now-available-in-Beta- (they actually locked the thread)
http://malwaretips.com/threads/ccleaner-5-00-5050.38038/
There is more users than what is just on these forums.
-
I can not understand why they went to such an ugly interface! This is a program used by many businesses and the last thing a real professional wants to see is a horrible UI! The old UI was perfect and fully functional! Fully native to windows keeping it's bulk down and looking like a professional interface.. AND NOT SOMETHING THAT LOOKS LIKE A FAKE ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE!!!!
-
Well if they do not go back to the old UI than I will be moving to something like Bleachbit which is an opensource plain jane cleaner that is still better than this awful UI.
-
I had to downgrade too since the new horrible flat metro kiddy UI.. Another great software ruined by horrible developers that think everything should look like it was designed for kids! Like Malwarebytes that I no longer use because of the horrible UI!
-
Ugg.. this UI is very unprofessional looking! I hate flat on top of that! I can't barely tell what is a button anymore.. I have to go back to version 4 because this is a DEFINITE KIDDY DOWNGRADE! It looks like something for children and not a professional tool!
I HATE METRO AND WILL NOT USE WINDOWS 8 BECAUSE OF IT THAN YOU SHOVE IT DOWN OUR THROATS WITH THIS DOWNGRADE!
Get off the METRO kick! It's the worst ever interface now your following Microsoft with the crap!
Give us an option to either use standard or metro interface! Because this version just plain sucks and destroys one of the best apps ever!
Already lost one good app because of retarded GUI change which was Malwarebytes which I now will no longer use unless they release a business edition with original interface and new engine.
-
They do not seem to be flash cookies.
Problem cropped up again.
Windows 7 32-bit
IE 11
Ccleaner latest version
Cookie list currently not deleted...
chatango.com
images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com
local
localhost
s.ytimg.com
static.wix.com
suntrust.com
So no these do not appear to be flash cookies. In fact it concerns me when sites like Suntrust still have cookies.
-
The bug is that it's not deleting IE cookies. I go manually into IE which I do not use and delete the cookies and they disappear from CCleaner. CCleaner is not deleting the IE cookies is what it comes down to.. it's broken for IE cookies.
-
-
This download links directly to the old version I already have installed.. The latest version is not on the site for download.
http://www.filehippo.com/download_ccleaner
As you can see it's the old version where can I actually download the new version?
-
I barely use IE mainly Firefox but when I do a cleaning it shows cookies still to be cleaned. Tried everything but they still show as needing cleaned so I went into IE options in Control Panel and deleted all cookies. The cookies to be cleaned disappeared this tells me that for some reason CCleaner is not deleting all IE cookies.
-
Ok I found the bug with it. The problem is even though I am ONLY using Firefox for my browser some old temporary internet files still existed for IE even though I reset it. So once manually deleted the cookies to clean is now empty. So the real issue is Ccleaner is not cleaning the Internet Explorer 9 cookies or temporary files at all.
-
No I am not running any sort of cookie add-on at all. I tried to do something different and search for the cookies in Firefox that CCleaner is reporting needs to be deleted and none of them show in that list at all. So I looked for cookies that are in Firefox and should be deleted and did not see some of them. It appears that Ccleaner is not actually looking at the Firefox Cookies Database to see what needs to be deleted or not.
-
I have several sites I have in the keep but all others are not being deleted at all. I can run and clean and than go back into cookies and it shows me cookies to be deleted still. It is not deleting cookies because if it was they would not be showing in the list as cookies to be deleted. As you can see by the attached image that the cookies are still showing as to be deleted and that is after running it twice.
Latest version 4.03.4151
Firefox 18.0.2
-
Cookies to delete are not deleting when I go to cookies they are still showing in the delete window as cookies to delete. I will close Firefox and than run Ccleaner and close Ccleaner and re-open and run it again and still the same cookies show in cookies to delete. It's not working at all.
Windows 7 32 bit
Firefox 10.0.0.32
-
No I will not put any IE garbage on my system. I personally hate IE and especially version 7, 8 or 9.. I hate the interface and the non-customization of the interface.
-
Well I only use it for a single site because I don't use IE.. only for the bank billpay page.. that is the only site I use that requires IE. Oh and also the Microsoft download site.. not a single else do I use IE for.
Paging file is too small
in Recuva
Posted
First of all when I have a decent size paging file on a ramdisk and the C drive why the hell does Recuva need a paging file on the slow mechanical drives? Second how much damn paging file size does it need to work?