Jump to content

Spathi

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. Hi, I just tried Defraggler, I was hoping it would just background defrag mildly every few hours on low CPU. So it is not much use to me. A reason some people here are having problems is that it seems to consolidate free space too aggressively. I don't see the point in this. For me, after a few minutes it hit 98% and stayed there for hours. I suspect if I deleted some files off my system it would repeat this process. I had already used Windows Defrag, Ultra Defrag (licensed cos I like it's disk graphic) and Diskeeper, but Defraggler still had to take hours... not good. What any defragger should do is defrag, then consolidate "small spaces" and leave large gaps and defragged areas with many already consolidated small files alone. It appears they all cater to the crowd that say "it did not defrag 100% to the front of my disk/back of my disk/middle of my disk". The obsession with clumping everything 100% perfectly in particular spots on the disk looks quite obtuse to me and results in more disk wear.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.