Jump to content

dplneural

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral
  1. ahhh see now I did not say I would not have chosen the UI, I clearly used the term potential UI bug in my original post and this is based on the layout of the controls. Tabs are standard items in MFC which can be owner drawn to be displayed any way you wish, hence why I considered it a potential layout issue because the objects in question are buttons. True tabs don't have a seam at the point of attachment and often the remaining tabs have an outline distinguishing them. Whereas in this case the processing controls appear to be overlayed, which is fine if that is the intention. I am not criticising the design or trying to second guess the intended design but merely providing feedback to the programmers.
  2. seemed to have started a can of worms here which was not the point. If you run Visual Studio Spy++ you will find they are buttons which is why I raised it as a potential bug...it was a layout thing to me. You don't need to use buttons to simulate tabs.
  3. thanks Vic, you are indeed correct. But personally I would still not cut off the right hand side of a button if I could avoid it and it is a trivial thing to rectify. Having said that it is what goes on under the bonnet that counts, cheers, Daniel
  4. Hi, I have attached an image highlighting a potential UI bug concerning the positioning of the processing controls and processing buttons. I hope this helps, dplneural
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.