GandalfTheWhite

Hi, maybe you are right. But for example Nero and a lot of other Tools can shutdow my pc while it is protected.... Greetings Gandalf

Hi, when my Screensaver locks the Computer (on resume forces Password) then Defraggler won't shutdown the Computer when its task is finished. Defraggler waits with the shutdown until I try to LogIn. Gandalf System: CPU: Q9450 OS: WinXP64 RAM: 4GiB

Hi, started defraggler in debug mode for 1 file (10MB) - maybe you could have a look. Defraggler.exe._1_11_148__2009_07_05_17_27_.txt Defraggler.exe._1_11_148__2009_07_05_17_27_.txt

Hi, I've now the proof that the size of the drive is the fact that matters... - Defraggler runs extremly slow on my 1TB Drive - createt a 10GB File/Virtual Hard Disk on this Drive (the file itself is not fragmented!) - the virtual HardDisk contains 10GB of fragmented Data (not the file itslef is fragmented!!) - defragmentation of the virtual harddisk is really fast 100 MB File in less than 3 seconds but the same file on the 1 TB Drive (note: they are the same phys. drive) needs about 2 to 3 min! Gandalf

Hi, when i start defraggler for my small drives a single file with the size of about 10MiB going to be "defraged" within no time. The Size of the volume is 50GiG. The same fragmented File on a 1TB Disk needed about 5 Sekonds to be defraged - sounds not much - but the whole defragment process takes about 24h on the 1TB Disk. Well, after the first run of defraggle i tried to just defragment some single files - but the time for defragmenting 100 files of 10 mb is about 10 mins. The measured drive speed for both drives are about 60MB/s (SATA) on a Q9450 System with 4Gig of Ram/Win XP64. When i defag some single files on the large volume defraggler needs a long time before an action (read/write) is indicated - what i mean is a few seconds nothing happened, then a short "flicker" of read/write activity and then a long pause before the new "shown" acitivity. Also defraggler is only using 25% (1 core) for the defrag process - on very short time periods there is something about 35%. Would be nice if defraggler could use more than one core for a longer time period -> maybe then it would be faster on large volumes. The Drives are both formated with NTFS. Gandalf PS As you could read here the problem seems to be the large drive not NTFS/FAT32. PPS My System: Q9450, 4 GiB Ram, WinXP64, 1TiB Disk, 250GiB Disk

Hi, I have created a 5Gig NTFS Drive. Then installed cygwin on the freshly created drive. After that I compressed the Disk (NTFS compression). A short check with the Defraggler shows me "140% Fragmentation" - but I think I know what is "wrong". The now compressed Disk is filled with 2.2 Gig of compressed Data. But the "uncompressed" size of the Data is 3.2 Gig. In this case, nearly all files are fragmented - so 3.2 Gig of Fragmented Data is more then the complete used disk space 3.2 Gig fragmented (uncompressed) > 2.2 used Space (compressed). I don't think this is a "Bug" but it is not nice - maybe you could fix it within the next release - better should be comparing the compressed sizes if it is possible to do so