QUOTE(Matt_ @ Aug 29 2007, 03:07 PM)

Autopatcher took about with a conservative estimate less than twenty minutes to download and use though.
I highly doubt that Microsoft stopped the Autopatcher team members from continuing the project because of a customer complaint. Personally, I think the aforementioned corporation will announce its own program for cumulative patches and will ultimately will not face any competition.
I have used AP (limited but nonetheless used) and am very grateful to those who contributed their personal time and effort to develop and support it - and, I want to thank them for that effort.
Frankly, I hope that the "aforementined corporation" (AC hereafter) really does produce its own standalone patching and updating tool - for both installed OS's and for slipstreaming. AC "could" (notice the distinction with respect to "would") produce an authorized and hopefully reliable package that would properly update/integrate AC's patches, updates, upgrades, and new items (IE7, IE8, Live Mail, WMP11, etc.) and have their own registry entries "correct" (maybe....). So, not all a bad thing if AC got into the game.....
The "current" system does indeed make load mouth sounds....<g>....I am in the process of bringing online 6 brand new machines at work. All are XPPro SP2 as delivered from HP. Straight out of the box the first pass on WU needs 97 updates, the second pass needs 11 updates, and the third pass needs 3 updates. The current philosophy is broken and there is no reliable tool from a corporate perspective to fix this. The ideal would be an authorized slipstreaming tool produced by AC that would permit the creation of "authorized" fully up to date install points for both the AC OS and the AC Office.....Enough....I am beginning to rant...
Anyway, an AC product would not "necessarily" be a "bad" thing if that is the result of the AP demise.