It didn't auto-find it.
I had to close the program and re-open it.
Also, why show the unrecoverable files?
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
1
Bug Kinda..
Started by TheFiresInTheSky, Jan 16 2007 11:12 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 1,738 posts
aka "neighberaaron"
- Gender:Male
- Location:somewhere in the glove
- Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.
Posted 16 January 2007 - 11:12 PM
When I opened it, I decided to plug my flash drive in and try it.
It didn't auto-find it.
I had to close the program and re-open it.
Also, why show the unrecoverable files?
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
It didn't auto-find it.
I had to close the program and re-open it.
Also, why show the unrecoverable files?
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
#2 OFFLINE
-
- Moderators
-
- 1,537 posts
Forum Moderator
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glendale, AZ
- Interests:CCleaner, Computers, and Movies
Posted 16 January 2007 - 11:25 PM
Really, that's not a bug. It's due to the way it's programmed. It will always probably be like that. I suggested to add an Option in Options to filter out Unrecoverable files already. But, that was a few days ago too. 
#3 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 1,626 posts
Lets Get Dangerous
- Gender:Male
- Location:QLD,Australia
- Interests:PC, LOTRO
Posted 17 January 2007 - 02:52 AM
TheFiresInTheSky, on Jan 17 2007, 09:12 AM, said:
...
Also, why show the unrecoverable files?
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
Also, why show the unrecoverable files?
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
Well I just tryed to recover 2 text files listed a unrecoverable with 36/37Kb each.
and they seemed to be recovered though they werent files i had ever seen before they where nero related but it still had plenty of readable text.
fireryone
There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#4 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 1,738 posts
aka "neighberaaron"
- Gender:Male
- Location:somewhere in the glove
- Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.
Posted 17 January 2007 - 03:08 AM
maybe a name like "partially unrecoverable" then?
#5 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 1,626 posts
Lets Get Dangerous
- Gender:Male
- Location:QLD,Australia
- Interests:PC, LOTRO
Posted 17 January 2007 - 05:05 AM
TheFiresInTheSky, on Jan 17 2007, 01:08 PM, said:
maybe a name like "partially unrecoverable" then?
and anything larger but likley unrecoverable should be something like your "partially unrecoverable" idea.
I still agree filtering them out via check box would be handy.
having the option to try to restore them is also good even if only partially, it may just be the part you needed.
eg. document/text files
fireryone
There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#6 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 17 posts
Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:Charlotte, NC
Posted 23 January 2007 - 03:56 AM
TheFiresInTheSky, on Jan 16 2007, 06:12 PM, said:
Also, why show the unrecoverable files?
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
After all, they are...unrecoverable.
-aaron
I like it the way it is because it lets' me know that Eraser - and all my "junk file" programs that feed Eraser - are working properly.
The Recuva program works extremely well here just the way it is - and it's blindingly fast compared to either of the other two programs I've previously used (RecoverMyFiles and FileRecover).
The only real question I have is why would the "Comments" section say "No overwritten clusters detected" ? Trust me, everything that was deleted got over-written. Am I just mis-understanding the wording?
At any rate - great job! Pete
Attached Files
-
MWSnap009_2007_01_22__22_49_02.jpg 51.42K
10 downloads
