There were two areas that said bad drivers:
Under IDE ATA/ATAPI controllers: Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller and
Under System Devices: NVIDIA Network Bus Enumerator
I was wondering how these are usually updated and if they are a part of other drivers.
I have the latest graphics and nForce drivers
Thanks
DriverAgent.com Scan Results
Started by Amit, Jan 06 2007 09:51 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 06 January 2007 - 09:51 PM
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 14 January 2007 - 05:50 PM
Anyone know?
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 14 January 2007 - 06:40 PM
Just because some scanning site says it's corrupt doesn't mean it's true. I'd image it's like aggressive registry cleaners that are notorious for removing valid registry data, e.g.; a false positive.
I'm no hardware expert however that 'Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller' would most likely be installed by Windows and be a Microsoft component, I've personally never seen an update in that area for any system I've had. Although the NVIDIA one I don't know about, so visiting their website may turn up something.
I'm no hardware expert however that 'Standard Dual Channel PCI IDE Controller' would most likely be installed by Windows and be a Microsoft component, I've personally never seen an update in that area for any system I've had. Although the NVIDIA one I don't know about, so visiting their website may turn up something.
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 14 January 2007 - 07:46 PM
I think you will find they are part of your mother board chipset. Plenty of info if you google it
IE8 - NIS 2012 - Mbam -XP Home SP3
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 15 January 2007 - 05:10 AM
If this is touchstone.com, I've had the same thing. Went to Nvidea and downloaded the latest driver package appropriate to my 'pooter. (That was a bit of a learning curve.) After installation, the driveragent scan reported similar results. I elected not to use the service after that, as it seemed clear to me there were no newer drivers available for the network bus enumerator. The others updated good as gold.
I think Andavari has it spot on, especially as they want you to pay for the drivers after they've told you what's ""bad".
I think Andavari has it spot on, especially as they want you to pay for the drivers after they've told you what's ""bad".
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 16 January 2007 - 12:12 AM
Andavari, on Jan 14 2007, 01:40 PM, said:
Just because some scanning site says it's corrupt doesn't mean it's true. I'd image it's like aggressive registry cleaners that are notorious for removing valid registry data, e.g.; a false positive.
Tarq57, on Jan 15 2007, 12:10 AM, said:
I think Andavari has it spot on, especially as they want you to pay for the drivers after they've told you what's ""bad".












