What do you recommend?
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 12:47 AM
I really like AVG and Spybot, but, I like Spyware Doctor's OnGuard features. For those that have done those security tests on programs, which ones should I keep?
I also have HJT, Norton '06, and CCleaner, but I'm not worried about those.
Thanks.
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 03:34 AM
I don't use Spyware Doctor so I can't comment on it.
What I use on my WinXP Home SP2 system:
- WinPatrol for real time monitoring of key system files
- Windows Defender for monitoring key WinXP files
- AVG Free anti virus
- Kerio v2.1.5 firewall for detection of OUTBOUND traffic
- hpHOSTS and MVPS HOSTS files managed by HostsMan to keep the prolific ads and malware sites away from my system
- SiteAdvisor to inform me of bad sites I am about to visit from Google or the site I am on
- Common sense and experience and to be VERY wary of anything FREE on the Internet
IE7Pro user
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 04:38 AM
I have...
Adware SE Personal
Spyware Doctor (Regged)
Spybot - S&D
I don't use any real-time protection. I just don't see any need in it. I do have a modified HOST file though, that's always a good idea.
The only one I have ever used is Spybot - S&D, but only once. Common sense is a good thing to use, so I never really get to use any of them. But, it's always better to be safe than sorry.
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 04:40 AM
http://forum.ccleane...?showtopic=7323
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 03:06 PM
TwistedMetal: Thanks. I do try to keep safe while online, I use Google's cache all the time when searching. And, I never put my full name on websites. I have heard about the HOST file with Hijack This, but I don't really know what it is.
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 06:05 PM
Hardware firewall
Netveda firewall
etrust antivirus
spybot s&d
adaware personal edition
superantispyware
avg antispyware
spywareblaster
a2
some people will think its overkill, but i only run them once a week or so to make sure everything is ok. and i would rather be safe than sorry. and so far its served me well.
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 09:11 PM
Hardware firewall
Norton 2006 AV/firewall at the moment
adaware personal edition
superantispyware
avg antispyware
spywareblaster
Firefox browser with SiteAdvisor/Adblocker Plus and WOT add on http://www.mywot.com/en/wot/home/
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 20 November 2006 - 09:48 PM
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 21 November 2006 - 01:28 AM
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 21 November 2006 - 01:36 AM
Woody, on Nov 20 2006, 08:28 PM, said:
I use Firefox. I love it.
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 21 November 2006 - 01:27 PM
Quote
Quote
Myth (Definition) - "A fiction or half-truth, especially one that forms part of an ideology." While Firefox is a decent Web Browser, there are numerous Myths floating around the Internet regarding it. Hopefully this site will debunk some of these.
The only reason Firefox and Opera browsers are safer is that they have ActiveX and Java scriping disabled by default.
MANY legitimate sites NEED ActiveX or Java scripting to display properly and to enable the added functions provided by those sites.
In IE ActiveX and Java scripting should be disabled in the Internet Zone and of course the Restricted Zone.
Eric Howes' Enough is Enough sets up the Zones to a restricted mode plus adds icons to quickly add sites to the Restricted Zone or Trusted Zone:
http://www.spywarewa...c/resource6.htm
SpywareBlaster and Eric Howes' IE-SPYAD add over 5,000 sites to the Restricted Zone:
http://www.javacools...areblaster.html
http://www.spywarewa...rce.htm#IESPYAD
IE7Pro user
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 21 November 2006 - 01:37 PM
http://nanobox.chipx.../FirefoxFables/ (its a funny read if you take the time to read it and firefox myths).
On a more serious note here are some nice responses to that firefox myths page:
http://robert.accettura.com/archives/2005/.../firefox-myths/
http://www.webdevout...refox_myths.php
The other two links you posted are good though.
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 21 November 2006 - 02:04 PM
xbrianx, on Nov 20 2006, 10:06 AM, said:
I have heard about the HOST file with Hijack This, but I don't really know what it is.
What is the HOSTS file:
http://en.wikipedia....wiki/Hosts_file
http://accs-net.com/...t_is_hosts.html
Tutorial:
http://www.bleepingc...tutorial51.html
A GOOD HOSTS file:
http://www.mvps.org/...p2002/hosts.htm
A much more comprehensive HOSTS file:
http://hphosts.mysteryfcm.co.uk/forum/view...hp?f=5&t=21
Managing multiple HOSTS files with HostsMan:
http://pwp.netcabo.p...l/hostsman.html
Keep your Security applications up to date by visiting Calendar of Updates regularly to see the weekly update notifications:
http://www.dozleng.com/updates/index.php?a...week=1164080746
IE7Pro user
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 21 November 2006 - 07:28 PM
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 22 November 2006 - 05:01 AM
rridgely, on Nov 21 2006, 01:37 PM, said:
http://nanobox.chipx.../FirefoxFables/ (its a funny read if you take the time to read it and firefox myths).
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 22 November 2006 - 05:11 AM
YoKenny, on Nov 21 2006, 01:27 PM, said:
http://www.javacools...areblaster.html
http://www.spywarewa...rce.htm#IESPYAD
"If you use IE-SPYAD in conjunction with SpywareBlaster or Spybot Search & Destroy, you should be aware that there is considerable overlap between the Restricted sites lists maintained by these three programs. As a result of that overlap, you may encounter minor issues while updating IE-SPYAD. See the ReadMe for IE-SPYAD for more information and advice.
My recommendation is to use ONE program to add sites to your Restricted sites zone. Using multiple programs to add sites to your Restricted sites zone leads only to overlap, conflicts, and confusion without necessarily increasing your level of protection."
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 22 November 2006 - 05:14 AM
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 22 November 2006 - 11:20 AM
I have more or less same software:
NoAdware
Avast Free
CCleaner
WinXP firewall
WinXP updates
I used Spyware Doctor, and if you really have to remove one of the two remove Spyware Doctor. Spybot seems better. The best thing to do is leave them running both. Spyboth does not run in the backround so it won't take much 'space'
Karl












