Jump to content


Conroe and the Zalman CNPS 9500 LED


4 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Stephen

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 199 posts

Posted 05 August 2006 - 02:23 PM

I am collecting parts for a new build. I plan on getting either the Conroe E6700 or the X6800 - depending upon where the prices are in a couple of months. I most likely will get an Intel mobo - something like the D975XBX Rev. 2, depending upon what else is out in a couple of months.

I do not plan on overclocking. Given that, would the Zalman CNPS 9500 LED provide better cooling than the stock HSF? Would the Zalman be any quieter than the stock HSF?

#2 OFFLINE   Eldmannen

    Annoyance

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts
  • Location:Internet
  • Interests:Free software, open-source, GNU GPL, Linux, security, encryption, privacy, anonymity.

Posted 05 August 2006 - 03:20 PM

Conroe is a good choice. It is a good performer.
I heard that it can be overclocked pretty far with just the stock HSF.

Zalman are known to make quiet HSF. I havent checked up the model CNPS 9500 LED but with Zalman's reputation, I would assume that it is more quiet than the stock HSF. The Conroe gets less warm than previous Intel CPU's, I dont know how the stock HSF sounds, but maybe it is pretty quiet.



#3 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 07 August 2006 - 04:43 AM

Conroe is great (and I'm an AMD fanboy >.<), but the Core 2 Extreme X6800 blows any CPU out of the water.
I'm guessing you got this from the Maximum PC dream PC?

Since Zalman makes such a high-quality HS (even without the fan) you could probably run it with the fan LOW or even OFF :o
No worries there. Except for the price o.0

#4 OFFLINE   lokoike

    Hufu FTW!!!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois, USA
  • Interests:Hardware / software troubleshooting, open-source / freeware, Popular Mechanics, my g/f, and hufu.

Posted 08 August 2006 - 12:18 AM

View Postzaphirer, on Aug 6 2006, 11:43 PM, said:

Conroe is great (and I'm an AMD fanboy >.<), but the Core 2 Extreme X6800 blows any CPU out of the water.
The Core 2 Extreme is indeed a fantastic proc. But comparing AMD's best proc to the Core 2 is apples to oranges, because the AMD is still a 90 nm process, whereas the Intel is 65 nm. I have a feeling as soon as AMD shrinks down their dies, they will retake the lead in both processing power and low thermals / power consumption.
Save a tree, eat a beaver.
Save a tree, wipe with an owl.


Every time a bell rings, a thread gets hijacked!
ding, ding!


Give Andavari lots of money and maybe even consider getting K a DVD-RW drive.

If it's not Scottish, IT'S CRAP!!!

#5 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 August 2006 - 05:47 AM

View Postlokoike, on Aug 7 2006, 05:18 PM, said:

The Core 2 Extreme is indeed a fantastic proc. But comparing AMD's best proc to the Core 2 is apples to oranges, because the AMD is still a 90 nm process, whereas the Intel is 65 nm. I have a feeling as soon as AMD shrinks down their dies, they will retake the lead in both processing power and low thermals / power consumption.

I hope so :P