Jump to content


Old hard drives start to kick the bucket


5 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Humpty

    Super Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,125 posts

Posted 11 July 2006 - 03:14 PM

Quote:

2006 MAY BE the year that will mark the slow start of slaughtering the old electro-magnetic dinosaurs, replaced by a flashy answer. Hard drives will pretty much kick the bucket - it's no long slot - soon.

After Samsung launched Q30Plus-SSD with a 32GB solid state drive, it was only the matter of time before the other vendors claimed their share of the pie.

Story

#2 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 11 July 2006 - 05:20 PM

Solid-sate drives are cool, but hard drives still have superior capacity. I myself never used all that much space, so I would be especially interested in a super-fast drive :)

See what iRAM does to Windows in terms of boot times :o

#3 OFFLINE   Eldmannen

    Annoyance

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts
  • Location:Internet
  • Interests:Free software, open-source, GNU GPL, Linux, security, encryption, privacy, anonymity.

Posted 11 July 2006 - 06:43 PM

Damn, that computer was amazing fast!
I wish my computer was fast like that.

SSD (Solid-state disks) are cool, but they have small diskspace, limited amount of writes and some operations are slower than on mechanical disks I think. But it will be interesting to see how the progress...

And SSD disk is totaly silent, that is what is best! :)



#4 OFFLINE   lokoike

    Hufu FTW!!!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,223 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois, USA
  • Interests:Hardware / software troubleshooting, open-source / freeware, Popular Mechanics, my g/f, and hufu.

Posted 11 July 2006 - 09:01 PM

View PostEldmannen, on Jul 11 2006, 01:43 PM, said:

...and some operations are slower than on mechanical disks I think...
Really? I don't see why that would be. I was under the impression that any Flash ROM address could be accessed instantaneously, while of course, hard drives have to spin to the addresses one by one. I guess I'll have to read up on that and figure out which is faster...

But yeah, Flash ROM totally rocks! I've heard that a Flash ROM drive only uses around 5% of the power consumed by a hard drive, so just think of how long a notebook battery could last! Pretty sweet.

As far as the limited number of writes, I sure hope they can up that number. For now, I would only use a Flash ROM drive as a backup, since backups aren't written to and read from as frequently as an OS or application drive.

I will note that I had a 256 MB Flash ROM stick that I filled and emptied daily for over a year, and it never had any troubles whatsoever. So hopefully the short life span issue is more hype than anything. I guess we'll find out soon enough...
Save a tree, eat a beaver.
Save a tree, wipe with an owl.


Every time a bell rings, a thread gets hijacked!
ding, ding!


Give Andavari lots of money and maybe even consider getting K a DVD-RW drive.

If it's not Scottish, IT'S CRAP!!!

#5 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 July 2006 - 05:19 PM

Flash drives and ROM sticks are physically tougher than hard drives... no moving parts. I don't know how long it will last, but since I format around once a year, life-span won't make much of a difference.

#6 OFFLINE   Eldmannen

    Annoyance

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts
  • Location:Internet
  • Interests:Free software, open-source, GNU GPL, Linux, security, encryption, privacy, anonymity.

Posted 12 July 2006 - 05:46 PM

There is an Wikipedia article about this;
* http://en.wikipedia....olid_state_disk

"The flash memory cells tend to fail after around a million writes which made early devices unsuitable for storage which is often updated in place, such as swap files."