Jump to content


A 4.1 GHz Dual Core at $130 - Can it be True?


5 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Humpty

    Super Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,125 posts

Posted 10 June 2006 - 03:21 AM

Quote:

The bottom line is that the Athlon FX-60 and the Pentium Extreme Edition 965 have both met their match - there's simply no escaping this conclusion!

Story

#2 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 June 2006 - 03:58 AM

Actually, they have. That chip consumes 260W of power at IDLE.

#3 OFFLINE   Humpty

    Super Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,125 posts

Posted 10 June 2006 - 05:46 PM

Using that amount of power why do they say it needs no extra cooling?

Had me hooked until you mentioned that aspect. :)

#4 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 10 June 2006 - 07:27 PM

View PostHumpty, on Jun 10 2006, 10:46 AM, said:

Using that amount of power why do they say it needs no extra cooling?

Had me hooked until you mentioned that aspect. :)

Well, they said they needed water cooling (recommended) past 4 ghz...
I was looking at the article a few weeks ago and decided to check out the forums, some guys there pointed that out.

#5 OFFLINE   PS3

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 215 posts
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia
  • Interests:Technology

Posted 14 June 2006 - 08:42 AM

liquid cooling costs alot to refill. better not get a 4ghz processor just yet till they figured out a way to be cost efficient.

#6 OFFLINE   zaphirer

    n00b

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,163 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 14 June 2006 - 10:07 PM

View PostPS3, on Jun 14 2006, 01:42 AM, said:

liquid cooling costs alot to refill. better not get a 4ghz processor just yet till they figured out a way to be cost efficient.

I think that a CPU is that consumes about 7x more power than most processors and may last only 2-3 years is not cost efficient to begin with.