Jump to content


linux iso


15 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   TheFiresInTheSky

    aka "neighberaaron"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:somewhere in the glove
  • Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.

Posted 17 April 2006 - 05:38 PM

i get a link from hazlenut about linux iso.

i try the cd and i get this,

ISOLINUX 2.04 2003-04-16 isolinux: Loading spec packet failed, trying to wing it
...
isolinux:Failed to locate CD-ROM device; boot failed.


i used this information from here

and downloaded live CD, intel 86 live cd from here

whats wrong with it!

#2 OFFLINE   DjLizard

    Dial-a-fix author

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 06:42 PM

This is just a guess, but try burning it slower (24x or less).

#3 OFFLINE   TheFiresInTheSky

    aka "neighberaaron"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:somewhere in the glove
  • Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.

Posted 17 April 2006 - 06:49 PM

i just tried another installation from that site but it didnt work. i tried the first one. i burned them at x4 speed

another thing i might add in, i erased the OS and i was just going to put linux in it but it doesnt seem to be working.

#4 OFFLINE   Mike Rochip

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 08:03 PM

This may be a wild guess but is it possible you are having issues with your cd burner or cd burning software? I've had both in the past and most recently I was having strange intermittent problems while creating CDs. Sometimes they would burn OK and sometimes had errors or wouldn't burn at all. I switched from Nero to AVS Disk Creator, which is free, and have had no problems since.

Information Download

BTW, thanks to theTOM_SK for the recommendation and to Andavari for the two links.

#5 OFFLINE   TheFiresInTheSky

    aka "neighberaaron"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:somewhere in the glove
  • Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.

Posted 17 April 2006 - 08:18 PM

could it be that my computer specs arent good enough to run linux?

#6 OFFLINE   JohnDemolition

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 924 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 17 April 2006 - 08:20 PM

that depends. what are your computer specs?

#7 OFFLINE   TheFiresInTheSky

    aka "neighberaaron"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:somewhere in the glove
  • Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.

Posted 17 April 2006 - 08:30 PM

i cant get inside the puter to check but all the BIOS says is:
processor speed-200 MHz
0032768 KB
base memory-640KB
extended memory-31744KB
cache size-256K
processor type-pentiumŪ chip
with-MMX™ technology

thats all i can get



I JUST TRIED IT IN ANOTHER COMPUTER AND IT WORKS. SO IVE WASTED A DAY TRYING TO GET IT TO WORK WHEN IT COULDNT EVEN HANDLE IT. IS THERE ANY WAY TO GET IT TO WORK WITHOUT BUYING ANYTHING?

#8 OFFLINE   DjLizard

    Dial-a-fix author

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 09:25 PM

Linux even works on 386s, dude, chill out.

#9 OFFLINE   TheFiresInTheSky

    aka "neighberaaron"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:somewhere in the glove
  • Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.

Posted 17 April 2006 - 09:53 PM

so how do i get it to work on 32 MB RAM?

#10 OFFLINE   krit86lr

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Missouri, USA

Posted 17 April 2006 - 10:15 PM

View Postneighberaaron, on Apr 17 2006, 04:53 PM, said:

so how do i get it to work on 32 MB RAM?
32 MB of RAM! Holy Crap dude. Pull a card out of one of your other computers and up that a bit. That's worthless.

btw PC100 & PC133 cards are usually interchangeable

#11 OFFLINE   DjLizard

    Dial-a-fix author

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,339 posts

Posted 17 April 2006 - 11:34 PM

32MB of RAM is also enough (for Linux itself -- if you don't install X11).

#12 OFFLINE   Eldmannen

    Annoyance

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts
  • Location:Internet
  • Interests:Free software, open-source, GNU GPL, Linux, security, encryption, privacy, anonymity.

Posted 18 April 2006 - 01:23 PM

View Postkrit86lr, on Apr 17 2006, 10:15 PM, said:

32 MB of RAM! Holy Crap dude. Pull a card out of one of your other computers and up that a bit. That's worthless.

btw PC100 & PC133 cards are usually interchangeable
a Pentium 200 uses EDO not PC100 or PC133 RAM.



#13 OFFLINE   krit86lr

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Missouri, USA

Posted 18 April 2006 - 02:24 PM

View PostEldmannen, on Apr 18 2006, 08:23 AM, said:

a Pentium 200 uses EDO not PC100 or PC133 RAM.
haha...I didn't even look to see what he was using. :o Just guessed.

#14 OFFLINE   TheFiresInTheSky

    aka "neighberaaron"

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,738 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:somewhere in the glove
  • Interests:computers, myspace, website building, skating, ITG, DDR, summers, hanging out at the mall.

Posted 18 April 2006 - 09:28 PM

here we go, im out of it when it comes to this kind of stuff. just had my first peek in a computer yesterday. dont know about cards, i do know a bit about memory tho and i heard you had to have to of the same at a time? and what is X11? i was so confused when i installed linux so i just basically kept pressing continue.
moved linux topics here.

#15 OFFLINE   JohnDemolition

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 924 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 19 April 2006 - 12:30 AM

View PostDjLizard, on Apr 17 2006, 04:34 PM, said:

32MB of RAM is also enough (for Linux itself -- if you don't install X11).
but you'll prolly be stuck with a command line interface.

PS: i'm not sure if KDE or GNOME works on a system like that.

#16 OFFLINE   Eldmannen

    Annoyance

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts
  • Location:Internet
  • Interests:Free software, open-source, GNU GPL, Linux, security, encryption, privacy, anonymity.

Posted 19 April 2006 - 12:48 AM

X11 is version X11 of the X Window System.
X Window System is often called just 'X'.

If you dont have X, then you have just a command line, console, shell prompt. Black screen with white text where you can type in commands.
But if you have X you can get graphics and a window system and run graphical applications.

* http://en.wikipedia....X_Window_System

And over X you usually run a WM (Window Manager) and/or DE (Desktop Environment) such as GNOME, KDE, Xfce, Fluxbox, etc. And depending on which you choose to use, your desktop looks and behaves different.