Jump to content


Dilbert - gives out malware


  • You cannot reply to this topic
15 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   chiawaikian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 03:00 AM

It seems that the Dilbert cartoon site (or one of its advertisers) is dishing up a little more than jokes.



Posted Image

#2 OFFLINE   Mike Rochip

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 04:29 AM

There's a thread that discusses this here (pcreview.co.uk). Apparently it's utilizing an ActiveX control that can bypass IE safeguards. Luckily you didn't get winfixer, I hear it's a nightmare!

Why would Dilbert do this?!?

#3 OFFLINE   chiawaikian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 08:51 AM

You get Errorsafe I heard. :(

#4 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 17 March 2006 - 10:16 AM

Symantec info about ErrorSafe
Complexity of incoherent design.

#5 OFFLINE   chiawaikian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 02:31 PM

A rogue anti-spyware program in short. Just like WinFixer.

#6 OFFLINE   Eldmannen

    Annoyance

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,198 posts
  • Location:Internet
  • Interests:Free software, open-source, GNU GPL, Linux, security, encryption, privacy, anonymity.

Posted 17 March 2006 - 04:18 PM

Mail the author of the website and express your disgust.
Also, stop goto that site, boycott it!



#7 OFFLINE   Mike Rochip

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 17 March 2006 - 08:51 PM

Looks like Winfixer and ErrorSafe may be the same-

"WinFixer is another dubious program of the same nature and tribe of ErrorSafe. It has a very similar website, only difference being, it’s in complete red where ErrorSafe is all blue! MicroWorld experts are currently studying the components of ErrorSafe and its ramifications."

castlecops.com

Looks like both are pretty ingenious, worthless, and aggravating.

#8 OFFLINE   chiawaikian

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 73 posts

Posted 18 March 2006 - 04:56 AM

Besides mailing the webmaster, what we can do is to pass this information around, maybe to PC magazines and express our disgust.

#9 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 18 March 2006 - 07:42 AM

View Postchiawaikian, on Mar 17 2006, 10:56 PM, said:

Besides mailing the webmaster, what we can do is to pass this information around, maybe to PC magazines and express our disgust.
Also send the info to law enforcement FBI, InterPol, etc., so that people whom author malicious software can get what's coming to them; fines or prison.
Complexity of incoherent design.

#10 OFFLINE   krit86lr

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Missouri, USA

Posted 19 March 2006 - 03:00 AM

Most definitely! So far I have only sent in 2 complaints, and the links are also in my email address book for easy forwarding to the appropriate officials.

FTC Complaint Form

Listing of Government Agencies & Links

#11 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 19 March 2006 - 07:38 AM

I have a friend in the FBI, so all I have to do is call her.
Complexity of incoherent design.

#12 OFFLINE   krit86lr

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Missouri, USA

Posted 19 March 2006 - 07:43 AM

From now on complaints are to be sent to Andavari, for direct transfer of objectionable material to the FBI.


hehe...Won't that be fun Andavari?? Have your eyes popped out yet? :blink:

:lol:

#13 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 19 March 2006 - 07:49 AM

View Postkrit86lr, on Mar 19 2006, 01:43 AM, said:

From now on complaints are to be sent to Andavari, for direct transfer of objectionable material to the FBI.
hehe...Won't that be fun Andavari?? Have your eyes popped out yet? :blink:

:lol:
I'm not scared, because I'll just have my dog answer the phone. My dog actually does answer the phone sometimes, she hates the ringing and will knock it off it's cradle and she'll bark into it loudly.
Complexity of incoherent design.

#14 OFFLINE   Mike Rochip

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 19 March 2006 - 07:56 AM

View PostAndavari, on Mar 19 2006, 12:49 AM, said:

I'm not scared, because I'll just have my dog answer the phone. My dog actually does answer the phone sometimes, she hates the ringing and will knock it off it's cradle and she'll bark into it loudly.

How do you know the call isn't for her?

#15 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 19 March 2006 - 08:05 AM

View PostMike Rochip, on Mar 19 2006, 01:56 AM, said:

How do you know the call isn't for her?
Never though of that. Imagine picking up the phone and telling your dog "it's for you."
Complexity of incoherent design.

#16 OFFLINE   krit86lr

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Missouri, USA

Posted 19 March 2006 - 08:18 AM

View PostAndavari, on Mar 19 2006, 02:05 AM, said:

Never though of that. Imagine picking up the phone and telling your dog "it's for you."
I bet annoying sales people would quit calling really quick. :D