Greener computing
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 08 July 2012 - 11:18 PM
So, I switched to http://www.blackle.com/ for my homepage.
This Google version takes less energy to backlight, being mostly black, & doesn't spam you with messages to "Upgrade to Chrome!".
Now, lets hear your suggestions for greener computing!
* I had in mind to purchase a quad core netbook & output it to my LCD monitor to replace my desktop PC when I finish compiling all my projects...
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:21 AM
My drives are all 'green,' and spin down after being inactive for a while (annoyingly, one of these is like five minutes)
Information for people wondering about the registry cleaner
The quicky CCleaner FAQ!
Winapp2.com
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 07:34 AM
Winapp2.ini, on 09 July 2012 - 12:21 AM, said:
By the way Winapp, not sure if this is just a tiny mistake, but on the Guide page of the Winapp website, on Step 2, you have it as with quotations rather than without quotations?
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:06 AM
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:58 AM
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:41 PM
Icedrake, on 09 July 2012 - 07:34 AM, said:
By the way Winapp, not sure if this is just a tiny mistake, but on the Guide page of the Winapp website, on Step 2, you have it as with quotations rather than without quotations?
Saving items with quotes perserves the extension you give to them. It ensures it will save as an ini file and not any other kind of file. (You can also use this to save files with content of a different type, for example, saving a PNG file as a JPEG)
Information for people wondering about the registry cleaner
The quicky CCleaner FAQ!
Winapp2.com
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 06:20 PM
Super Fast, on 08 July 2012 - 11:18 PM, said:
It may actually save the life of an amoeba.
Being serious though when looking about on download sites there's a few "green computing" programs that are supposed to "save you electricity," and "save the planet," yet most user reviews state they're a joke.
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 09 July 2012 - 08:22 PM
hazelnut, on 09 July 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:
Nice one, Hazel! Earlier, I had tried out http://www.inksaver....view/index.html
#9 OFFLINE
#10 OFFLINE
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 15 July 2012 - 08:20 PM
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 15 July 2012 - 08:50 PM
I have LED and LCD monitors. I guess LED uses the least energy cos there's no backlight. It runs very cool.
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 15 July 2012 - 09:08 PM
Information for people wondering about the registry cleaner
The quicky CCleaner FAQ!
Winapp2.com
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 15 July 2012 - 10:22 PM
kroozer, on 15 July 2012 - 08:50 PM, said:
I have LED and LCD monitors. I guess LED uses the least energy cos there's no backlight. It runs very cool.
That is incorrect. LED's are the backlight instead of fluorescent tubes.
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:10 AM
Keatah said:
Thanks for the headsup. I've paid little attention to screens cos they seem to be so simple. I recently saw an LED/LCD combo advertised at BestBuy. Can you explain that configuration?
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 16 July 2012 - 09:20 AM
LED denotes the type of backlighting. LCD describes the pixel array. There is nothing revolutionary about these. Just a different style of backlighting.
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 16 July 2012 - 12:08 PM
Winapp2.ini, on 09 July 2012 - 01:41 PM, said:
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 17 July 2012 - 05:50 PM
kroozer, on 16 July 2012 - 09:10 AM, said:
Kroozer, my understanding is:
LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) -> Backlights whole screen
LED (Light Emitting Diode) -> Backlights only the pixels that are in use. Black areas remain unlit. Power savings may be 70% or so.
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 17 July 2012 - 06:25 PM











