Jump to content

Return to Piriform.com

CCleaner 3.20 not closing browser(s)


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   titanad

titanad

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 06:00 AM

I frequently have a problem with my browser(s) not closing completely. I may close the browser, but when I run CCleaner a message pops up asking if I want CCleaner to close the browser. Since updating to version 3.20, this feature is NO longer working. It just skips the item(browser) when searching and deleting the files.

This was a very useful feature and I hope you will consider adding this back to CCleaner. I have deleted version 3.20 and will keep version 3.19 if and until it will again have this feature.

thanks,

Harold

#2 OFFLINE   Winapp2.ini

Winapp2.ini

    Friendly neighborhood addon manager

  • Beta Testers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,754 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Island, New York
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 27 June 2012 - 10:20 AM

I can confirm that I am not prompted to close my browser.

#3 OFFLINE   Nergal

Nergal

    Volunteer CCleaner Demon/Post Meddler

  • Moderators
  • 5,209 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Get off my Lawn, y'darn kids!
  • Interests:being grumpier
    Laughing
    Crying
    Sleep comes Later though.

Posted 27 June 2012 - 12:35 PM

Are both of you of 64bit version? is this true with both chrome and firefox (or just one or the other)? I know winapp2 is not but titanad are you running ccleaner in a language other than english?
ADVICE FOR USING CCleaner'S REGISTRY INTEGRITY SECTION
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explanation

#4 OFFLINE   Winapp2.ini

Winapp2.ini

    Friendly neighborhood addon manager

  • Beta Testers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,754 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Island, New York
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 27 June 2012 - 12:46 PM

I did not recieve prompts for :

Firefox 14 beta (32bit)
Waterfox 13 (64bit)
Chrome 20 (32bit)

I did receieve a prompt for Thunderbird x64 (Earlybird)

#5 OFFLINE   MrT

MrT

    Official Bug Fixer

  • Bug Fixers
  • 435 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ontario, Canada

Posted 27 June 2012 - 01:16 PM

Let us know if you have any of these entries on your ccleaner.ini or under "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Piriform\CCleaner"
MSG_WARNCHROMECACHE=false
MSG_WARNMOZCACHE=false

Set them with the word "true" in order to be prompted again.
MSG_WARNCHROMECACHE=true
MSG_WARNMOZCACHE=true

#6 OFFLINE   Winapp2.ini

Winapp2.ini

    Friendly neighborhood addon manager

  • Beta Testers
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,754 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Long Island, New York
  • Interests:Sleeping

Posted 27 June 2012 - 01:44 PM

Weird, I never selected (knowingly or intentionally, anyway) the 'do not prompt me again' thing, but that seems to be the case here.

#7 OFFLINE   titanad

titanad

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 27 June 2012 - 05:42 PM

Are both of you of 64bit version? Yes, 64bit
Are you running ccleaner in a language other than english? No, english

--Let us know if you have any of these entries on your ccleaner.ini or under "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Piriform\CCleaner"--

Remember, I said that I had re-installed version 3.19 and those registry keys don't show up for this version. Are you saying that if I upgrade to version 3.20(and later versions) that I will have to edit the registry every time?

#8 OFFLINE   Keatah

Keatah

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 563 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 27 June 2012 - 09:25 PM

Perhaps we can have options to toggle this functionality?
On a clear disk you can seek forever.

#9 OFFLINE   titanad

titanad

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 29 June 2012 - 03:33 AM

View PostMrT, on 27 June 2012 - 01:16 PM, said:

Let us know if you have any of these entries on your ccleaner.ini or under "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Piriform\CCleaner"
MSG_WARNCHROMECACHE=false
MSG_WARNMOZCACHE=false

Set them with the word "true" in order to be prompted again.
MSG_WARNCHROMECACHE=true
MSG_WARNMOZCACHE=true
MrT,

I replied to your question in post #7. Please reply to my post.

Edited by Andavari, 29 June 2012 - 09:19 AM.
No need to triple the quote


#10 OFFLINE   Alan_B

Alan_B

    Super Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,508 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lancashire, England

Posted 29 June 2012 - 04:45 AM

View Posttitanad, on 29 June 2012 - 03:33 AM, said:

MrT,

I replied to your question in post #7. Please reply to my post.
You have no right to demand answers from developers unless you have paid for support.

Mr T. was asking questions to determine what needed fixing.

You said that you had no keys MSG_WARNCHROMECACHE etc.
It is unrealistic to expect Mr. T. to predict in advance of fixing the problem whether such a key will be used again.

It should be obvious that CCleaner has never yet required a user to meddle with the registry as standard procedure,
and Mr. T. was kindly giving a fix for those that needed a fix to v 3.20.
I am confident that the problem will be fixed on future versions and will take care of any inappropriate keys and settings from previous versions.

#11 OFFLINE   titanad

titanad

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 30 June 2012 - 03:21 AM

View PostAlan_B, on 29 June 2012 - 04:45 AM, said:

You have no right to demand answers from developers unless you have paid for support.

Mr T. was asking questions to determine what needed fixing.

You said that you had no keys MSG_WARNCHROMECACHE etc.
It is unrealistic to expect Mr. T. to predict in advance of fixing the problem whether such a key will be used again.

It should be obvious that CCleaner has never yet required a user to meddle with the registry as standard procedure,
and Mr. T. was kindly giving a fix for those that needed a fix to v 3.20.
I am confident that the problem will be fixed on future versions and will take care of any inappropriate keys and settings from previous versions.

First, I wasn't demanding anything. I answered the questions MrT had asked.  I waited on a response from MrT for a day and when I did not hear back I simply asked(nicely) for a reply.

Edited by DennisD, 30 June 2012 - 07:38 AM.
I've removed an undeserving comment from your post..


#12 OFFLINE   DennisD

DennisD

    Member

  • Moderators
  • 9,120 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England: NE Coast

Posted 30 June 2012 - 07:54 AM

Alan was correct in his above reply, and the comment I removed wasn't necessary. To get direct developer support, there is an option to pay for it.

On this free support forum the devs at times enter into a topic to obtain the info they may need to provide a fix in a future version.

They've done that, and your issue has also been confirmed by another member. There isn't anywhere else for this topic to go really, as the suggestion re the registry was simply a workaround until a fix is found.

Going back to a previous version until then is the best way to go.

#13 OFFLINE   Super Fast

Super Fast

    Super Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,210 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 30 June 2012 - 02:36 PM

@titanad -> Thanks for posting about the issue. Tiny things like that could escape my notice, although they are certainly things I would be very annoyed with discovering after using it long enough to have it happen to me. I am sure with your input that they will have it fixed in newer versions.

If you are able to do so, if you could verify whether that key existed, it would greatly assist the developers in crushing the bug.

The reason they ask is not so much that they want you to have to manually edit it each time, but just that if you can verify whether it exists, then they will have a more definite knowledge about what needs to be done to fix a future version. Software does contain bugs, & sometimes more so than others, so your input is very valuable.

If you are unable to do so, do not worry. As Dennis here kindly noted, there are others having reported the same issue. So future versions should be fixed. :)