Jump to content


Opera highly critical flaw


14 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Aethec

    Red Panda

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lausanne, Switzerland

Posted 08 March 2010 - 08:20 PM

http://blogs.zdnet.c...ecurity/?p=5619

"In the absence of a patch, Opera users are urged to avoid browsing to untrusted Web sites or switch to an alternative browser."
;)
Piriform French translator

#2 OFFLINE   Anomaly

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 259 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 March 2010 - 08:47 PM

Way to go Opera. Hurry up and rush out another update before it's ready and stable so you can follow Chrome like a bunch of idiots.

#3 OFFLINE   Aethec

    Red Panda

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lausanne, Switzerland

Posted 08 March 2010 - 09:47 PM

They wanted the ballot screen, and now they published an unfinished product because of it. How ironic. :)
Piriform French translator

#4 OFFLINE   Anomaly

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 259 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 08 March 2010 - 11:03 PM

View PostAethec, on Mar 8 2010, 04:47 PM, said:

They wanted the ballot screen, and now they published an unfinished product because of it. How ironic. :)

Just the beginning to. Both Opera and Firefox are going to shoot themselves in the head in their pursuit of market share. They both need to just ignore Chrome and continue what they were doing. If they continue to chase Chrome they will regret it. They are losing focus of what made them great browsers.

#5 OFFLINE   redhawk

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,216 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Beer and DVDs

Posted 08 March 2010 - 11:06 PM

I like it how they use the phrase "untrusted Web sites" I guess they're referring to porn sites and places to download illegally cracked commercial software right?? Posted Image

There are still 3 things you can do:
a) run Opera inside a guest account that way even if the exploit was used it would be self-contained inside the account.
b) use SandboxIE and launch Opera as a sandboxed process.
c) bite the bullet and install Mozilla Firefox. :D

Richard S.

#6 OFFLINE   abu aufa

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ardhillah

Posted 09 March 2010 - 02:01 AM

now, all browser of mine (FF,Chrome & Opera) is insecure refering Secunia advisories. :(

btw, i'd stick with Opera as default.It's pretty damn FAST. ;)

#7 OFFLINE   Aethec

    Red Panda

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lausanne, Switzerland

Posted 09 March 2010 - 07:18 AM

View Postabu aufa, on Mar 9 2010, 03:01 AM, said:

now, all browser of mine (FF,Chrome & Opera) is insecure refering Secunia advisories. :(

btw, i'd stick with Opera as default.It's pretty damn FAST. ;)

Chrome isn't ;)
http://secunia.com/a.../product/28713/
Piriform French translator

#8 OFFLINE   abu aufa

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ardhillah

Posted 09 March 2010 - 07:32 AM

I missed ;)

Rescan with PSI and Chrome is safe :)

#9 OFFLINE   TeeJay3800

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Metro Detroit

Posted 09 March 2010 - 11:51 PM

View Postredhawk, on Mar 8 2010, 06:06 PM, said:

a) run Opera inside a guest account that way even if the exploit was used it would be self-contained inside the account.
b) use SandboxIE and launch Opera as a sandboxed process.
c) bite the bullet and install Mozilla Firefox. :D
Isn't browsing using a "private tab" fairly secure as well?
Dell Latitude D600
Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit SP1

Posted Image

#10 OFFLINE   marmite

    Relax, it's only ones and zeros!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 877 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 10 March 2010 - 12:54 AM

View PostTeeJay3800, on Mar 9 2010, 11:51 PM, said:

Isn't browsing using a "private tab" fairly secure as well?
No (assuming it's akin to IE's private browsing). It doesn't prevent malicious content from being downloaded. All that it does is to stop content (e.g. cookies, history and temporary internet files) being stored on the hard drive - it's more of a privacy thing.

#11 OFFLINE   TeeJay3800

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Metro Detroit

Posted 10 March 2010 - 12:44 PM

Official statement from Opera
Dell Latitude D600
Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit SP1

Posted Image

#12 OFFLINE   hazelnut

    try to stay calm

  • Moderators
  • 9,462 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Huddersfield uk

Posted 10 March 2010 - 01:40 PM

Teejay don't you think that most folk would have realised it was a theoretical security issue when they worked out that..

Quote

A value in the range is 263 to 264-1 was returned as a valid number, despite being outside the signed data-range of the compiler provided conversion function (so it should have triggered an error instead), and as a result a negative value was returned in the range -263 to -1.

I know I did :rolleyes: (as if!!)
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE

http://www.piriform.com/docs

#13 OFFLINE   aqua

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 295 posts

Posted 22 March 2010 - 03:03 PM

new Opera 10.51 Build 3315

#14 OFFLINE   redhawk

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,216 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Beer and DVDs

Posted 22 March 2010 - 06:24 PM

Looks like Firefox is now Firefux atm. :(

Richard S.

#15 OFFLINE   marmite

    Relax, it's only ones and zeros!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 877 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 23 March 2010 - 06:09 PM

View Postredhawk, on Mar 22 2010, 06:24 PM, said:

Looks like Firefox is now Firefux atm. :(
Eh? The fix is out early, as the article you refer to states. Just downloaded it for the PortableApps version :)

More info ... http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/23/fi...x_zero_day_fix/