SPECCY as Standalone
Started by al fon, Feb 23 2010 07:54 AM
10 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 23 February 2010 - 07:54 AM
Hi,
It would be very useful and would also ease the users' work if there would be standalone version of SPECCY.Those programs run fast, occupy less memory, can use less CPU...
Please consider this.
Thanks,
Al Fon
It would be very useful and would also ease the users' work if there would be standalone version of SPECCY.Those programs run fast, occupy less memory, can use less CPU...
Please consider this.
Thanks,
Al Fon
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:01 PM
What do you mean by standalone?? when speccy is installed it exists as a single executable in c:\program files\speccy
Richard S.
Richard S.
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 23 February 2010 - 01:12 PM
... and you can download a 'portable' version anyway!
http://www.piriform.com/speccy ... and scroll to the bottom.
But as Richard says, there's no difference in the way they execute.
http://www.piriform.com/speccy ... and scroll to the bottom.
But as Richard says, there's no difference in the way they execute.
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 23 February 2010 - 09:12 PM
redhawk, on Feb 23 2010, 01:01 PM, said:
What do you mean by standalone?? when speccy is installed it exists as a single executable in c:\program files\speccy
Yes I would agree with al fon's statement. Along with Defraggler and Recuva.
WinXP SP3 and Vista Home Premium SP2
#5 OFFLINE
#6 OFFLINE
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2010 - 12:27 PM
marmite, on Feb 23 2010, 10:49 PM, said:
To reiterate, the portable versions of these products are standalone.
WinXP SP3 and Vista Home Premium SP2
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2010 - 01:07 PM
Once again, the portable versions are standalone applications. The user privileges that are required to run them is a different matter entirely.
Whatever it is that you want, it's not defined by the term "standalone application". Are you asking for "applications that run under an ordinary user account"? ... because that's not the same thing.
I've not tried to run any Piriform app as an ordinary user so I'm not sure what their individual requirements are. If you're running on a work PC is there a domain GPO (group policy) in place that restricts what you can do?
Whatever it is that you want, it's not defined by the term "standalone application". Are you asking for "applications that run under an ordinary user account"? ... because that's not the same thing.
I've not tried to run any Piriform app as an ordinary user so I'm not sure what their individual requirements are. If you're running on a work PC is there a domain GPO (group policy) in place that restricts what you can do?
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2010 - 02:18 PM
Lucky10, on Mar 1 2010, 10:27 PM, said:
... computer at work and you still need admin rights to use them.
... you had better review your work policies about third party applications.
Just cause its "standalone" it doesn't really circumvent "NO Installing Software" rules.
You don't want to get yourself fired like this guy:
http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showto...54&hl=fired
fireryone

There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2010 - 06:57 PM
fireryone, on Mar 1 2010, 02:18 PM, said:
... you had better review your work policies about third party applications.
Just cause its "standalone" it doesn't really circumvent "NO Installing Software" rules.
You don't want to get yourself fired like this guy:
http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showto...54&hl=fired
Just cause its "standalone" it doesn't really circumvent "NO Installing Software" rules.
You don't want to get yourself fired like this guy:
http://forum.piriform.com/index.php?showto...54&hl=fired
Its actually al fon thats asking about standalone and he hasn't been back since.
WinXP SP3 and Vista Home Premium SP2
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 01 March 2010 - 10:33 PM
Lucky10, on Mar 1 2010, 06:57 PM, said:
Yes I've read that topic fireryone but where I work some computers can install what they want too and some can't.
Lucky10, on Mar 1 2010, 06:57 PM, said:
CCleaner will run a a standalone why can't the other apps? None of them do any particular damage. Defraggler just defrags a particular drive. Recuva just recovers deleted files. What is so sinister about those?
Some applications must be run with certain privilege level because Windows requires that in order to be able to carry out certain tasks. Some applications are written that way because it is deemed that the actions they are performing are administrative tasks and should not be carried out by someone who doesn't have administrative access to the machine.
I'm not sure about Defraggler's requirements. But if you could run Recuva without admin rights then that would give you access to areas of the drive which, as a limited user, you should not have access to.
Lucky10, on Mar 1 2010, 06:57 PM, said:
Its actually al fon thats asking about standalone and he hasn't been back since. 











