To The Developers: ECCN's for your software?
Started by enJOY120, Jan 28 2010 03:14 PM
11 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 28 January 2010 - 03:14 PM
I was looking for the ECCN (Export Control Classification Number) for your CCleaner software. I realize pretty much anybody won't have a clue what this even is, but I use your software on occasion for technician work and one of my clients is requesting ECCN's for all of the tools that I use. Would you be able to provide me this information? Thanks very much.
Btw, I tried using the contact form on the website and after a few days, I received a less than helpful automated message. :/
Alex
Btw, I tried using the contact form on the website and after a few days, I received a less than helpful automated message. :/
Alex
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 28 January 2010 - 03:24 PM
Interesting concept. Does downloading software from a foreign source constitute importing it?
(Apologies for the less than helpful reply Alex)
(Apologies for the less than helpful reply Alex)
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 28 January 2010 - 03:28 PM
marmite, on Jan 28 2010, 10:24 AM, said:
Wow, interesting concept. Does downloading software from a foreign source constitute importing it?
(Apologies for the less than helpful reply Alex)
(Apologies for the less than helpful reply Alex)
To be honest, I don't know. Up until my client requested this, I had never heard of it. I know this, for most microsoft applications I have had little problem finding ECCN's. Same goes for FireFox, MalwareBytes, and other more mainstream applications. But, most smaller / niche apps I have completely struck out with.
I also got a response from the developer of Memtest for windows (HCIDesign), and he seemed adamant that due to his applications lack of any form of encryption, it was therefore unnecessary to register an ECCN for it specifically.
Thoughts?
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 28 January 2010 - 03:33 PM
enJOY120, on Jan 28 2010, 03:28 PM, said:
I also got a response from the developer of Memtest for windows (HCIDesign), and he seemed adamant that due to his applications lack of any form of encryption, it was therefore unnecessary to register an ECCN for it specifically.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Also depends where it's going from / to of course.
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 28 January 2010 - 03:51 PM
marmite, on Jan 28 2010, 10:33 AM, said:
That would seem to make sense ... and finding this site seems to back that up ... http://www.export.go...main_018803.asp
Also depends where it's going from / to of course.
Also depends where it's going from / to of course.
Ok, does CCleaner use any form of encryption?
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 28 January 2010 - 03:53 PM
Nope.
#7 OFFLINE
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 09 February 2010 - 11:59 AM
Another relevant article on ECCN for anyone interested (probably not many!
) ... http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 09 February 2010 - 01:04 PM
Makes your eyes glaze over just reading it!!
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE
http://www.piriform.com/docs
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#10 OFFLINE
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:53 AM
Actually, it most likely does have an ECCN - however that could be EAR99.
Assuming there is any direct US involvement in the development of the software (either in the US, or by a US person), or has US content other than content classified EAR99, then it will have an export classificaiton. Otherwise it comes under "No US jurisdiction" and can be exported free of US export licencing.
If the software does not come under any of the sections in:
http://ecfr.gpoacces....1.3.87&idno=15
then the classification is EAR99, and can be exported without licence (or rather, as "No licence required") - but still cannot be exported to US embargoed countries. (Note: plenty of the ECCN classifications also allow export without licence)
So the original question still actually stands for the developers (since they are usually in the best position to answer the question) - what is the ECCN of the software?
Assuming there is any direct US involvement in the development of the software (either in the US, or by a US person), or has US content other than content classified EAR99, then it will have an export classificaiton. Otherwise it comes under "No US jurisdiction" and can be exported free of US export licencing.
If the software does not come under any of the sections in:
http://ecfr.gpoacces....1.3.87&idno=15
then the classification is EAR99, and can be exported without licence (or rather, as "No licence required") - but still cannot be exported to US embargoed countries. (Note: plenty of the ECCN classifications also allow export without licence)
So the original question still actually stands for the developers (since they are usually in the best position to answer the question) - what is the ECCN of the software?
#12 ONLINE
Posted 15 March 2012 - 12:58 AM
ADVICE FOR USING CCleaner'S REGISTRY INTEGRITY SECTION
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explaination
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explaination


This topic is locked









