Jump to content


Windows 7 fails to block 7 of 10 pieces Malware


18 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   abu aufa

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ardhillah

Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:23 AM

SOURCE

win7 fails on 7 :lol:

#2 OFFLINE   marmite

    Relax, it's only ones and zeros!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 877 posts
  • Location:UK

Posted 06 November 2009 - 11:05 AM

I'll happily live with reduced UAC and fight malware in other ways thank you very much.

#3 OFFLINE   fireryone

    Lets Get Dangerous

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,626 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:QLD,Australia
  • Interests:PC, LOTRO

Posted 06 November 2009 - 12:54 PM

I always disable UAC.
And run other free better security software instead.
fireryone



There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.

#4 OFFLINE   Aethec

    Red Panda

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,714 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lausanne, Switzerland

Posted 06 November 2009 - 03:33 PM

This "test" is nonsense. You don't make a test using 10 malware samples.
Piriform French translator

#5 OFFLINE   CTskifreak

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CT, USA

Posted 06 November 2009 - 05:40 PM

Quote

If you go back through the articles to find out how the actual test was conducted, they did it by manually executing the malware programs on the machine. That makes their whole test nonsense. I'm sorry, but if you tell your machine to execute a piece of malware, then you deserve to end up with a piece of malware running on your system.

It's not the job of the operating system to prevent user stupidity. The job of the operating system is to prevent remote exploits that allow code to be executed without any intervention (buffer overflow attacks and the like). If they had shown that a computer could be infected with these programs without the user needing to manually execute the malware code, then I would be concerned. As it is however, all they have shown is that if you do stupid things on your computer, bad stuff can still happen to you.

Point in case. This test fails.

AJ
Unofficial Ambassador to the Maximum PC Forums and Moderator of the Piriform Facebook page

#6 OFFLINE   Icedrake

    Shazam!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,646 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States
  • Interests:Reading, using my computer, astronomy, physics, mathematics, etc.

Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:51 PM

This test is a complete fail. I agree with Aethec. You can't conduct a proper test using only 10 malware samples! You need to use hundreds of malware samples to actually get a good percentage of how whatever you're testing is doing.
Website: www.icedrake.co.cc
YouTube: www.youtube.com/icedrake99
DeviantART: www.icedrake99.deviantart.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/icedrake99

#7 ONLINE   Corona

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,930 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:US

Posted 06 November 2009 - 09:52 PM

I agree.

#8 OFFLINE   New_Age

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 845 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Spring Lake, North Carolina
  • Interests:Computers, hangin with friends, watching TV, swimming, hiking, listening to music, spending time with my GF.

Posted 08 November 2009 - 01:33 AM

Agreed! get the Apps. to protect yourself. don't just trust Windows Defender... <_<
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit Edition | COOLER MASTER Centurion 590 with 4 120mm Blue LED FANS 1 Regular 120MM FAN and a Custom Window Side Panel | AMD Athlon II x4 2.6GHZ Stock| XIGMATEK HDT-S963 92mm | ASRock A780GXE/128 | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) @800MHZ | CF 2 XFX 4850 1GB @GPU940/MEM1005 | 320GB/OS 160GB/Storage HDDs | LG CD/DVD SATA | Rosewill 600W 2 12v Rail@44 | Ccleaner, Defraggler | Malwarebytes', SUPERAnti-Spyware | Avira AntiVir Personal | Google Chrome v3/4, IE8

#9 ONLINE   Corona

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,930 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:US

Posted 08 November 2009 - 02:53 AM

Quote

Windows Vista Ultimate 64-Bit Edition | COOLER MASTER Centurion 590 with 4 120mm Blue LED FANS 1 Regular 120MM FAN and a Custom Window Side Panel | AMD Athlon II x4 2.6GHZ Stock| XIGMATEK HDT-S963 92mm | ASRock A780GXE/128 | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) @800MHZ | CF 2 XFX 4850 1GB @GPU940/MEM1005 | 320GB/OS 160GB/Storage HDDs | LG CD/DVD SATA | Rosewill 600W 2 12v Rail@44 | Ccleaner, Defraggler | Malwarebytes', SUPERAnti-Spyware | Avira AntiVir Personal | FireFox, Google Chrome v4, IE8

Good God, do you run NASA?

#10 OFFLINE   CTskifreak

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CT, USA

Posted 08 November 2009 - 04:09 AM

View PostCorona, on Nov 7 2009, 10:53 PM, said:

Good God, do you run NASA?


That's nothing - wanna hear my rig? LOL

AJ
Unofficial Ambassador to the Maximum PC Forums and Moderator of the Piriform Facebook page

#11 OFFLINE   New_Age

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 845 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Spring Lake, North Carolina
  • Interests:Computers, hangin with friends, watching TV, swimming, hiking, listening to music, spending time with my GF.

Posted 09 November 2009 - 05:42 AM

View PostCTskifreak, on Nov 7 2009, 11:09 PM, said:

That's nothing - wanna hear my rig? LOL

AJ
what AJ said. Computers have come along way and i'm no Intel Fan as you can see. me AMD all the way. AMD FTW! o.. and i am running Windows 7 Ultimate now.

i do however someday plan on buying bigger HDDs for my rig. maybe two 500GB.

i would go Intel but hey you can't go wrong with a Quad Core only $100! and OC'ing that to 3.3GHZ is/was awesome! plus Intel needs to lower there prices on their older CPUs but you get good performance. AMD is just better in my opinion.

AJ, have you messed with the new ATI 58XX series GPUs? Bad ass i'd say. may get one 5850 later or something along the road when i need to.
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit Edition | COOLER MASTER Centurion 590 with 4 120mm Blue LED FANS 1 Regular 120MM FAN and a Custom Window Side Panel | AMD Athlon II x4 2.6GHZ Stock| XIGMATEK HDT-S963 92mm | ASRock A780GXE/128 | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) @800MHZ | CF 2 XFX 4850 1GB @GPU940/MEM1005 | 320GB/OS 160GB/Storage HDDs | LG CD/DVD SATA | Rosewill 600W 2 12v Rail@44 | Ccleaner, Defraggler | Malwarebytes', SUPERAnti-Spyware | Avira AntiVir Personal | Google Chrome v3/4, IE8

#12 OFFLINE   CTskifreak

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CT, USA

Posted 09 November 2009 - 07:04 AM

View PostNew_Age, on Nov 9 2009, 01:42 AM, said:

what AJ said. Computers have come along way and i'm no Intel Fan as you can see. me AMD all the way. AMD FTW! o.. and i am running Windows 7 Ultimate now.

i do however someday plan on buying bigger HDDs for my rig. maybe two 500GB.

i would go Intel but hey you can't go wrong with a Quad Core only $100! and OC'ing that to 3.3GHZ is/was awesome! plus Intel needs to lower there prices on their older CPUs but you get good performance. AMD is just better in my opinion.

AJ, have you messed with the new ATI 58XX series GPUs? Bad ass i'd say. may get one 5850 later or something along the road when i need to.

I haven't used one - but I've read about that- got to see what NVIDIA does with the GT300 series. AMD has the lower end of the market - Intel has the mid to high range locked up. The newer i5 and i7 processors are ridiculous. I'd suggest getting a 1 TB drive - you can get OEM versions for about $85-90 on Newegg.

My system:

Intel Core i7 920
Asus P6T Motherboard
6 GB's DDR3 Patriot Viper RAM
NVIDIA GTX 285 GPU
1 TB Samsung HDD
X-Fi soundcard
Windows 7 Ultimate

I might get an aftermarket CPU cooler and overclock it some - I'm on the fence about that.

AJ
Unofficial Ambassador to the Maximum PC Forums and Moderator of the Piriform Facebook page

#13 OFFLINE   Icedrake

    Shazam!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,646 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United States
  • Interests:Reading, using my computer, astronomy, physics, mathematics, etc.

Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:45 AM

View PostCTskifreak, on Nov 9 2009, 03:04 AM, said:

I haven't used one - but I've read about that- got to see what NVIDIA does with the GT300 series. AMD has the lower end of the market - Intel has the mid to high range locked up. The newer i5 and i7 processors are ridiculous. I'd suggest getting a 1 TB drive - you can get OEM versions for about $85-90 on Newegg.

My system:

Intel Core i7 920
Asus P6T Motherboard
6 GB's DDR3 Patriot Viper RAM
NVIDIA GTX 285 GPU
1 TB Samsung HDD
X-Fi soundcard
Windows 7 Ultimate

I might get an aftermarket CPU cooler and overclock it some - I'm on the fence about that.

AJ
:o
Website: www.icedrake.co.cc
YouTube: www.youtube.com/icedrake99
DeviantART: www.icedrake99.deviantart.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/icedrake99

#14 OFFLINE   New_Age

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 845 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Spring Lake, North Carolina
  • Interests:Computers, hangin with friends, watching TV, swimming, hiking, listening to music, spending time with my GF.

Posted 09 November 2009 - 09:47 PM

what AJ?! no OC on a i7 and stock cooling? o shame on you. go after a 3rd party cooler and OC that beast.

Note: OC if you ONLY and when you need to
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit Edition | COOLER MASTER Centurion 590 with 4 120mm Blue LED FANS 1 Regular 120MM FAN and a Custom Window Side Panel | AMD Athlon II x4 2.6GHZ Stock| XIGMATEK HDT-S963 92mm | ASRock A780GXE/128 | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) @800MHZ | CF 2 XFX 4850 1GB @GPU940/MEM1005 | 320GB/OS 160GB/Storage HDDs | LG CD/DVD SATA | Rosewill 600W 2 12v Rail@44 | Ccleaner, Defraggler | Malwarebytes', SUPERAnti-Spyware | Avira AntiVir Personal | Google Chrome v3/4, IE8

#15 OFFLINE   abu aufa

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 694 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ardhillah

Posted 10 November 2009 - 03:04 AM

and 8 of 10 viruses ;)

#16 OFFLINE   CTskifreak

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CT, USA

Posted 10 November 2009 - 03:12 AM

UAC isn't a full blown anti virus - it's supposed to stop notify you for administrator level changes - not all viruses need that to do their damage.

AJ
Unofficial Ambassador to the Maximum PC Forums and Moderator of the Piriform Facebook page

#17 OFFLINE   hazelnut

    try to stay calm

  • Moderators
  • 9,448 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Huddersfield uk

Posted 10 November 2009 - 05:59 AM

View PostCTskifreak, on Nov 10 2009, 03:12 AM, said:

UAC isn't a full blown anti virus - it's supposed to stop notify you for administrator level changes - not all viruses need that to do their damage.

AJ

Good remark.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE

http://www.piriform.com/docs

#18 OFFLINE   New_Age

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 845 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Spring Lake, North Carolina
  • Interests:Computers, hangin with friends, watching TV, swimming, hiking, listening to music, spending time with my GF.

Posted 10 November 2009 - 07:28 PM

wow, who thought UAC was an Anti-Virus? LMAO
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-Bit Edition | COOLER MASTER Centurion 590 with 4 120mm Blue LED FANS 1 Regular 120MM FAN and a Custom Window Side Panel | AMD Athlon II x4 2.6GHZ Stock| XIGMATEK HDT-S963 92mm | ASRock A780GXE/128 | G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) @800MHZ | CF 2 XFX 4850 1GB @GPU940/MEM1005 | 320GB/OS 160GB/Storage HDDs | LG CD/DVD SATA | Rosewill 600W 2 12v Rail@44 | Ccleaner, Defraggler | Malwarebytes', SUPERAnti-Spyware | Avira AntiVir Personal | Google Chrome v3/4, IE8

#19 OFFLINE   CTskifreak

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,413 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:CT, USA

Posted 10 November 2009 - 07:46 PM

Well that's what all of these tests seem to try and prove that. Like I said 3 post earlier,

View PostCTskifreak, on Nov 9 2009, 11:12 PM, said:

UAC isn't a full blown anti virus - it's supposed to stop and notify you for administrator level changes
And then my counter point was -

Quote

- not all viruses need that to do their damage. AJ
So, it seems like they assume that viruses need administrator levels of access to change stuff - we here obviously know that is far from the truth.

AJ
Unofficial Ambassador to the Maximum PC Forums and Moderator of the Piriform Facebook page