Best Media Player
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 27 October 2009 - 02:47 AM
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 27 October 2009 - 11:06 AM
greyowl2, on Oct 27 2009, 02:47 AM, said:
http://www.winamp.com/
I`m using this video/audio player for quite a long time with no problems here.
#3 OFFLINE
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 27 October 2009 - 12:19 PM
#7 OFFLINE
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 28 October 2009 - 02:49 PM
1. it adds the toolbar
2. it sets the serchbox default as ask.com. (even after uninstall it leaves ask.com in the search provider list, thankfully not set as default anymore)
It seems to be randomly installing anyway... so be prepared to uninstall a toolbar if you try this.
http://www.kmplayer.com/forums/showthread....4989&page=2
note: I'm all happy with optional toolbars even if pre-checked, as long as i Always get an option to uncheck it "before" its installed!

There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 28 October 2009 - 03:24 PM
Plays most audio formats, and it's a feather weight without any bloat, plus can be portable put onto CD's and DVD's as a player directly from those discs.
Video 1 - MPUI with MPlayer
Plays a literal ton of stuff, plus can be portable put onto CD's and DVD's as a player directly from those discs.
Video 2 - Media Player Classic Homecinema
Good if you already have the necessary codecs pre-installed, and good for "almost gapless" video playback of split videos.
That's what I use, and haven't had the need for anything else, and all three are free as well.
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 28 October 2009 - 11:15 PM
JDPower, on Oct 28 2009, 05:14 AM, said:
jd knows
yes vlc does contain all its own codecs and does not require any system libraries. So whoopie doo it can play mostly anything. Which means all the codecs are older versions.
it cannot support subtitles for avi (and .rst, .psb, .usf, .ssf) though this might of changed now. as that was a older version ???????????
The only props i will give it is the ability to play incomplete downloads.
I prefer KMP it can do every thing VLC can do only better, and is lower in cpu then VLC,
i also suggest MPC-HC with ffdshow
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 29 October 2009 - 12:34 AM
YouTube: www.youtube.com/icedrake99
DeviantART: www.icedrake99.deviantart.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/icedrake99
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 29 October 2009 - 01:25 AM
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 29 October 2009 - 01:59 AM
If others want to comment, I will appreciate all advise.
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 29 October 2009 - 05:03 AM
fireryone, on Oct 28 2009, 02:49 PM, said:
1. it adds the toolbar
2. it sets the serchbox default as ask.com. (even after uninstall it leaves ask.com in the search provider list, thankfully not set as default anymore)
It seems to be randomly installing anyway... so be prepared to uninstall a toolbar if you try this.
http://www.kmplayer.com/forums/showthread....4989&page=2
#16 OFFLINE
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 27 November 2009 - 02:29 PM
Now I just use Windows Media Player (11? I forget sorry) and rip all my CDs in lossless format (1 or 2 down from RAW but only your dog would hear the difference) to the external hard drive that deals with all my movies and music.
I still use Power DVD from around 2000 - 2002, it works well so no need to replace it with modern versions.
They both run well in 5.1 sound and to date I have had no problems, but it is early yet
I still don’t know what problem my PC has with Win Amp ?????
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 27 November 2009 - 09:01 PM
M0NKEY, on Nov 27 2009, 08:29 AM, said:
Like you I also use lossless, FLAC in particular when archiving, and for playback on my system I use Ogg Vorbis auTov build, I used to use LAME but the sometimes gapless encoding/playback issues were enough for me to ditch it and go back to Ogg Vorbis which has no gapless issues. I also have an older version of PowerDVD and have no need to ever update it..
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 27 November 2009 - 10:15 PM
Regarding picture formats such as BMP, Jpeg, png, gif etc.
I have always hated Jpeg because it loses quality (erodes) over a short space of time in drive storage.
Therefore I always use RAW or BMP formats to keep good resolutions when stored on the PC. They are larger files, not such a big issue with modern HD space, so maybe it would suggest that sound files are the same as picture files?
A Raw file should outlive a MP3 file for instance.
I don’t have MP3 files but I have been told you can sometimes hear a change in the time signature and it loses solidity.
Unlike text files some types of data just don’t like to be crunched.
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 27 November 2009 - 10:37 PM
M0NKEY, on Nov 27 2009, 10:15 PM, said:
A Raw file should outlive a MP3 file for instance.
I don’t have MP3 files but I have been told you can sometimes hear a change in the time signature and it loses solidity.
You are correct to say that certain file types, those that exhibit what is known as lossless compression, are best as a 'reference copy' of a file ... they will always have optimum quality. If you save a (lossless) BMP as a (lossy) JPEG, you will lose some quality. That's why it's always better to have your original copy of (e.g. photo) files in something like RAW, BMP or lossless TIFF. If you want to publish a copy of your photo online, take an appropriate resolution JPEG because it's much smaller ... but always hang on to your original lossless copy.
Similarly, if you're editing a photo, work in lossless format. Don't keep saving as a JPEG ... you'll lose quality each time you save, even on 'maximum' quality.
A couple of articles ... http://en.wikipedia....dio_file_format, http://en.wikipedia....ata_compression.













