ishan_rulz, on Jul 1 2009, 11:36 AM, said:
Latest version of course

Not very meaningful.
I hate such statements - so misleading.
Firstly, I CANNOT tell if you are complaining about the "Latest" version now available, so I do not know if any such problem still exists.
Secondly, you may have downloaded on the same day that a new version becomes available, in which case date identification is useless.
Today is just one of those days when I think I might update some software, and I like to check any user forum for any reported problems before I risk the same.
Because of the meaningless "Latest version of course", I was irritated by the extra searching to find it was probably version v2.21.940 released on 25/06/2009.
I do not intend to single out ishan_rulz for criticism,
I just wish to recommend for any-one who has a problem that a version number will always be meaningful,
and "Latest version" will ALWAYS BE WRONG after the next release.
Additional related comment / complaint to developers,
It would be useful if the change log showed the date of release for every version.
The changelog is naturally the first place I looked to see what was "latest" as at July 1st, and of course I was disappointed.
If anyone posted a fault before 25th June it would have referred to a previous version,
and I just cannot see any clue upon release dates for versions other than the last version.
Regards
Alan