When I go to analyze ccleaner it suddenly closes at 37%
any help would be nice,
Thanks!
Im Having A Problem
Started by DahWillsta, Jun 23 2009 06:21 PM
7 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:21 PM
DahWillsta™
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:27 PM
Can you say which version of ccleaner you are using.
Also which operating system you use.
Has this just started happening?
Also which operating system you use.
Has this just started happening?
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE
http://www.piriform.com/docs
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 23 June 2009 - 06:29 PM
hazelnut, on Jun 23 2009, 01:27 PM, said:
Can you say which version of ccleaner you are using.
Also which operating system you use.
Has this just started happening?
Also which operating system you use.
Has this just started happening?
When i run analyze it stops at 37% and shows this message,
The thread attempted to read from or write to a virtual address for which it does not have the appropriate access
CCleaner v2.20.920
MS Windows XP Home SP3
Genuine Intel CPU T2050 @ 1.60GHz
1.0GB RAM
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
IT=3000
ID=-1
PR=
DA=
RK=
RU=24
CK=0
SK=Temporary Files
VK=
VA=N_TEMP_DIRS
CR=57
PF=0
EI=0
FL=7
IIT=0
FI=-1
SI=0
DahWillsta™
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 25 June 2009 - 08:48 PM
DahWillsta, on Jun 23 2009, 01:29 PM, said:
The thread attempted to read from or write to a virtual address for which it does not have the appropriate access
CCleaner v2.20.920
MS Windows XP Home SP3
Genuine Intel CPU T2050 @ 1.60GHz
1.0GB RAM
ATI Mobility Radeon X1300
IT=3000
ID=-1
PR=
DA=
RK=
RU=24
CK=0
SK=Temporary Files
VK=
VA=N_TEMP_DIRS
CR=57
PF=0
EI=0
FL=7
IIT=0
FI=-1
SI=0
DahWillsta™
#5 OFFLINE
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 02 July 2009 - 11:39 PM
Vista is usually a minefield of problems?
I don't think!
I have had 3 Vista laptops and 2 Vista desktops in my house. My daughter started using a Vista laptop when she was 13, she is 15 now, she uses it to the max, facebooking, myspace'ing, msn'ing, photoshopping and anything else she needs to do (all at the same time). My sons are both gamers and use theirs for such purposes as well as for the reasons that my daughter uses hers.
Most people that bash Vista are doing so because they think it is the done thing and is cool. I am different, my laptop that I take to work to play on when time permits is running Vista and has never caused me a problem.
Maybe it is the old ID10T error that causes people to find problems with Vista.
Sure it is slow compared to XP, but that does not mean it is a problem, it still performs!
I don't think!
I have had 3 Vista laptops and 2 Vista desktops in my house. My daughter started using a Vista laptop when she was 13, she is 15 now, she uses it to the max, facebooking, myspace'ing, msn'ing, photoshopping and anything else she needs to do (all at the same time). My sons are both gamers and use theirs for such purposes as well as for the reasons that my daughter uses hers.
Most people that bash Vista are doing so because they think it is the done thing and is cool. I am different, my laptop that I take to work to play on when time permits is running Vista and has never caused me a problem.
Maybe it is the old ID10T error that causes people to find problems with Vista.
Sure it is slow compared to XP, but that does not mean it is a problem, it still performs!
My sites:
getit.me.uk | Get It on Facebook
youtubeartists.co.uk | YouTube Artists on Facebook | YouTube Artists on Twitter | YouTube Artists on YouTube
getit.me.uk | Get It on Facebook
youtubeartists.co.uk | YouTube Artists on Facebook | YouTube Artists on Twitter | YouTube Artists on YouTube
#7 OFFLINE
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 03 July 2009 - 10:41 AM
I too agree with Capman
My old machine has XP Home SP3 with a modest (intel pentium duel core processor & 1GB of RAM) it performs very well, however... I dont think my old machine would be up to running Vista at an acceptable pace
My new machine has Vista Home Premium 32-bit SP2 with an (intel core2 quad processor & 4GB DDR3 RAM) it's at least twice as fast to boot up, and easily out performs my old XP machine
Vista is different, and takes time to adjust too
My old machine has XP Home SP3 with a modest (intel pentium duel core processor & 1GB of RAM) it performs very well, however... I dont think my old machine would be up to running Vista at an acceptable pace
My new machine has Vista Home Premium 32-bit SP2 with an (intel core2 quad processor & 4GB DDR3 RAM) it's at least twice as fast to boot up, and easily out performs my old XP machine
Vista is different, and takes time to adjust too












