5 replies to this topic

[klausk kinski]

Why a very small utility from TuneUp, is much speeder than defraggler?

Sorry, I'm Spanish and my English is pathetic :S


---
Edit: Thank's ¬¬

[klausk kinski]

The question is of May 28 2009, 03:16 AM

Can somebody answer to me?

Currently I use MyDefrag but I would like to know that I should be defraggler.

Thank's!

[jawz101]

The TuneUp program you mentioned looks fine if you want to pay for it, I guess.

CCleaner & a defragmentation program would much of the equivalent functions.

MyDefrag is a great program. I particularly use Defraggler when I want to target only those files which our fragmented.

They are complimentary programs but Defraggler focuses on informing you of the specific files that are fragmented.

Personally I would continue using MyDefrag as your primary defragmenter unless are looking for something else.

[klausk kinski]

Yes, Defraggler+MyDefrag (with optimize option) is great!

Thank's!

[piriuser1]

klausk kinski, on Sep 20 2009, 03:15 AM, said:

Yes, Defraggler+MyDefrag (with optimize option) is great!

Thanks!

You should stick to one defrag program. Often the optimization routines are not exactly the same. Using a second program may therefore undo some of the optimizations that the first program did.

[mr don]

klausk kinski, on May 28 2009, 06:16 AM, said:

Why a very small utility from TuneUp, is much speeder than defraggler?

Sorry, I'm Spanish and my English is pathetic :S


---
Edit: Thank's ¬¬

Defraggler is quick if you do a quick defrag, but the full defrag does both files & free space.

A lot of "fast" defraggers will perhaps just be doing a "quick" defrag instead of complete.