CCleaner got me fired!
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 11 May 2009 - 05:48 PM
(And this was my dream job I had worked so hard for!! And all I was doing was trying to make the computer run more efficiently and keep my co-workers from snooping!!!!!)
(P.S. I still love CCLeaner!!!)
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 11 May 2009 - 06:13 PM
I'm sorry to hear that this has happened to you though and hope things work out for you.
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 11 May 2009 - 07:00 PM
Good luck finding another job.
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 11 May 2009 - 07:34 PM
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 11 May 2009 - 10:42 PM
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 11 May 2009 - 11:05 PM
AJ
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 12:39 AM
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 09:16 AM
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 12:08 PM
Well I don't think you are to blame for this considering you must have admin rights to install CC.
At the college where I work we've used CC for 5 years that I know of. A couple years ago I sent a request to the IT techs to install a newer version of CC as mine was about 17 versions behind. The reply was we don't install CC anymore as its only for private use (bull), plus it has a registry editor which we don't like users using.
So to get around this you use the INI option and save the CC folder to a flash drive and run it from there that way you don't have to install anything. Our company is very strict on what is installed on any computer. Only the IT tech know the password for administrator so only those guys can install. We also have so security software that reports back to the server what software is installed on every computer.
So in your case Rivanna if they didn't want you to install anything they shouldn't have given you admin rights, so its their fault.
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 02:33 PM
Keithuk, on May 12 2009, 12:08 PM, said:
Employees still have a duty of care (don't they?) and I don't think that loading unathorised software comes under that. After all, CCleaner.exe could well be anyoldcrap.exe renamed, or being used to remove traces of activity.
Rivanna777, on May 11 2009, 05:48 PM, said:
If you think I'm unduly harsh then nothing I say or do will have the slightest impact on your future, R. And nor will any of these posts. I should beg HR to take you back with a final warning, it's about all you can do.
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 06:50 PM
YouTube: www.youtube.com/icedrake99
DeviantART: www.icedrake99.deviantart.com
Twitter: www.twitter.com/icedrake99
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:28 PM
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 12 May 2009 - 08:33 PM
hope you land on your feat
edit: I just noticed Andavari is on the same wave length & already said what i felt
chin up
#14 OFFLINE
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 13 May 2009 - 01:55 AM

My computer:
AMD Phenom 9500 Quad-Core
3.00 gb RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT
600 gb Hard Drive, 3 partitions
Windows Vista Premium 32 bit and Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 14 May 2009 - 12:17 AM
To fire you is to show a lack of perspective, a lack of proportion, and a lack of perception. It is also very likely illegal.
If the company was so concerned about employees modifying their computer systems, then it behooved the company to place blocks on their systems to prevent that from happening. That is so very easy to do! And I have to wonder about any company that would maintain a system with such vulnerability that someone could set up a program like CCleaner and bring the entire business to its knees.
I think you are dealing with ignorance. Are you sure you want that job?
As you can see in surfing the web, there are vast differences in computer savvy between different companies.
For your future, look for something better. When you get it, negotiate a higher salary—try asking for 5% more than whatever you are offered. And ask, just incidentally, about their computer constraints—but don't mention this incident, because until they know you, this story would only work against you. (Never go in to a new situation while you are harbouring a complaint—no matter how justified a complaint—about an old situation.)
In the long run, you'll do better. When you encounter the short end of the stick from people like that, just file your new knowledge and insights away and remember them so that YOU will never be so unreasonable. Sooner or later, you yourself will have the choice to make a good decision or a bad decision in some same-same but different situation. When it's your turn, make the right decision.
Good luck.
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 14 May 2009 - 08:56 AM
Groonx, on May 14 2009, 12:17 AM, said:
The argument that the company shouldn't have allowed me to do it is tosh. Employees have moral and legal responsibilites and duties.
It's only CCleaner? How do you know that? Even if it were only CC, there's no list of good and bad applications.
R works for a law firm (Good Grief!) and has admitted using unathorised software to remove traces of activity on a company computer. Doesn't stand a chance.
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 14 May 2009 - 09:04 AM
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 14 May 2009 - 01:52 PM
All I can offer is sympathy but I think you got a bum rap. Employers are always asking their employees to show initiative, think outside the box, work smarter not harder, and countless other 'slogans of the month'. Yet when an employee does that, they get punished.
Even if your company had the legal right to fire you, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do. I think you got fired as Andavari mentioned. They are trying to reduce headcount.
Hope you find another job soon, preferably with a company that treats their people more fairly.
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 20 May 2009 - 01:35 PM
Augeas, on May 12 2009, 09:33 AM, said:
Not in the US, it's not. There have been many successful wrongful termination lawsuits bright about against companies that had no written policy in place. Not only for installing computer software but for just about any job-related activity you can imagine. Even if a policy is common knowledge and assumed to be understood by everyone, if it's not in writing, it doesn't exist as a legal reason for firing. Your country may have different laws but if the OP is in the US he has a good case.
I'm not surprised a law firm would think it could get away with such behavior, though. I once worked for a liquor manufacturer whose legal department is bigger than most entire companies. The legal department asked me to make copies of a commercial package on each PC in their department even though we only had a license for one PC. I pointed out that fact and they told me, "That company won't try to enforce the license. If they do, we'll keep them tied up in court so long, they'll go out of business trying to pay the legal fees." God bless lawyers!











