Yet, defraggler says "101% Fragmentation" and over 160K fragments???????
How is this possible? I don't easily accept anything "more than 100%"
Oh, and I did the Defraggler volume check - No Major (are their Minor??) problems found!
0
101% Fragmentation?
Started by zforray, Apr 08 2009 03:47 PM
1 reply to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 1 posts
Newbie
Posted 08 April 2009 - 03:47 PM
Just installed the latest version on a friends machine. They swear the have been running regular defrag.
Yet, defraggler says "101% Fragmentation" and over 160K fragments???????
How is this possible? I don't easily accept anything "more than 100%"
Oh, and I did the Defraggler volume check - No Major (are their Minor??) problems found!
Yet, defraggler says "101% Fragmentation" and over 160K fragments???????
How is this possible? I don't easily accept anything "more than 100%"
Oh, and I did the Defraggler volume check - No Major (are their Minor??) problems found!
#2 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 167 posts
Advanced Member
- Gender:Male
- Location:USA
- Interests:Tv<br />reading<br />computer <br />eating<br />sleeping<br />
Posted 08 April 2009 - 09:25 PM
zforray, on Apr 8 2009, 10:47 AM, said:
Just installed the latest version on a friends machine. They swear the have been running regular defrag.
Yet, defraggler says "101% Fragmentation" and over 160K fragments???????
How is this possible? I don't easily accept anything "more than 100%"
Oh, and I did the Defraggler volume check - No Major (are their Minor??) problems found!
Yet, defraggler says "101% Fragmentation" and over 160K fragments???????
How is this possible? I don't easily accept anything "more than 100%"
Oh, and I did the Defraggler volume check - No Major (are their Minor??) problems found!
