Jump to content


Spybot Search & Destroy or Microsoft Anti Spyware?


26 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   englishmen

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 955 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 11 August 2005 - 12:33 PM

For anti spyware protection i currently have SpywareBlaster, Ad-ware SE Personal & Spybot Search & Destroy and when i do my weekly scan for Spyware i also run a eWido Online scan. I would prefer not to have Microsoft Antispyware but in terms of protection if it does a better job then Sbybot then i guest i should but i was just wondering if you was to choose ONLY 1 which one you go for Spybot Search & Destroy or Microsoft Anti Spyware?

#2 OFFLINE   Doe Ray Me

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts

Posted 11 August 2005 - 01:06 PM

englishmen, on Aug 11 2005, 12:33 PM, said:

For anti spyware protection i currently have SpywareBlaster, Ad-ware SE Personal & Spybot Search & Destroy and when i do my weekly scan for Spyware i also run a eWido Online scan. I would prefer not to have Microsoft Antispyware but in terms of protection if it does a better job then Sbybot then i guest i should but i was just wondering if you was to choose ONLY 1 which one you go for Spybot Search & Destroy or Microsoft Anti Spyware?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Microsoft Anti-Spyware, picks up more spyware than Spybot and removes it quickly aswell

#3 OFFLINE   Newhotness

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 207 posts
  • Location:Canada

Posted 11 August 2005 - 01:46 PM

I've been using SB longer, yet i still think i'd throw my vote to msas, like mentioned above, its found loads more than SB, and the real-time protection seems better aswell.

#4 OFFLINE   englishmen

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 955 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 11 August 2005 - 01:56 PM

You say it removes more spyware but what spyware are you talking about?

#5 OFFLINE   Tarun

    Lunarian

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,071 posts

Posted 11 August 2005 - 02:16 PM

MSAS catches more than Ad-Aware and Spybot. Though Ad-Aware and Spybot get traces MSAS misses. All three are needed regardless.

#6 OFFLINE   Darkman

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 171 posts

Posted 11 August 2005 - 02:51 PM

Sounds like i would use that Microsoft one also.. but i use ME, not XP.. and they do not make that one for ME :(

:)

#7 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 11 August 2005 - 07:32 PM

Darkman, on Aug 11 2005, 09:51 AM, said:

Sounds like i would use that Microsoft one also.. but i use ME, not XP.. and they do not make that one for ME :(

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Now you know what to ask for as a Christmas present.
Complexity of incoherent design.

#8 OFFLINE   Mike Rochip

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 844 posts

Posted 12 August 2005 - 02:31 AM

Hello-

My 2 cents worth (due mostly to inflation) is I use the same combo Tarun does and between all 3 hardly anything gets by and they're all easy to configure and use. I didn't use SpyBot that much but since V 1.4 came out it's becoming my favorite. It seems to catch a lot more stuff than previous versions.

The only thing that bugged me about MSAS was that CWS.msconfig sailed right past it pretending to be msconfig.exe.

Seems like with the constant onslaught of new spyware definitions comes ever increasing scan times. I did finally figure out that it helps to have CCleaner and a good firewall to reduce the need to scan so often. :o

#9 OFFLINE   rridgely

    I hate computers

  • Moderators
  • 8,858 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 August 2005 - 03:01 AM

Mike it sounds like you have been scanning your pc excessively since you got infected. I don't know what your surfing habits are but for me as long as I keep spyware blaster up to date and only use firefox I dont get spyware at all. When I do scan usually once every week or two I only find tracking cookies that I could have gotten rid of with CCleaner.

Also watch out for what you download and you should be all set. Thats just my take on it though but I hate watching spyware scanners all day.

#10 OFFLINE   bpm3k

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 97 posts

Posted 12 August 2005 - 04:33 AM

englishmen, on Aug 11 2005, 05:33 AM, said:

Spybot Search & Destroy or Microsoft Anti Spyware?
I do not know why you would not use both.

#11 OFFLINE   berdy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 87 posts

Posted 12 August 2005 - 07:10 AM

see here (for patrol comparison)
http://www.dozleng.c...hp?pg=redundant

#12 OFFLINE   englishmen

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 955 posts
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 12 August 2005 - 08:21 AM

Thanks for all you replies and info guys but i was asking if you was to only use 1 and only 1 regardless if it misses stuff the other one catches. What 1 would you use? I know they are both brilliant apps all tho Microsoft just bought another company and renamed it :angry: . But what do you think is the best overall app?

#13 OFFLINE   berdy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 87 posts

Posted 12 August 2005 - 12:39 PM

see which area will be patrolled by each one in the link in my post above. I think MSAS covers more if not all.

#14 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,327 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 12 August 2005 - 09:41 PM

englishmen, on Aug 12 2005, 03:21 AM, said:

Thanks for all you replies and info guys but i was asking if you was to only use 1 and only 1 regardless if it misses stuff the other one catches. What 1 would you use?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Although I don't like MSAS because the GUI is slowish/sluggish, and it ties up my dial-up connection for some minutes I would have to go with it merely for its plethora of resident protection agents. If Microsoft is smart they'll turn MSAS into more than just an anti-spyware program and integrate anti-virus features, and a full featured firewall as well and make it a standard feature of Windows.
Complexity of incoherent design.

#15 OFFLINE   Tarun

    Lunarian

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,071 posts

Posted 12 August 2005 - 10:53 PM

Andavari, on Aug 12 2005, 05:41 PM, said:

Although I don't like MSAS because the GUI is slowish/sluggish, and it ties up my dial-up connection for some minutes I would have to go with it merely for its plethora of resident protection agents. If Microsoft is smart they'll turn MSAS into more than just an anti-spyware program and integrate anti-virus features, and a full featured firewall as well and make it a standard feature of Windows.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Windows One Care.

#16 OFFLINE   rridgely

    I hate computers

  • Moderators
  • 8,858 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:01 PM

Tarun, on Aug 12 2005, 06:53 PM, said:


Are you beta testing it?

#17 OFFLINE   Capman

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,079 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:06 PM

Notice to non-USA residents.

At this time, participation in the Windows OneCare Live Beta is open to U.S. residents only.


Tarun, how do you find out about all this kind of stuff?
Is it from intensive searching?
Or are you a participant of something to do with MS?

#18 OFFLINE   rridgely

    I hate computers

  • Moderators
  • 8,858 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:17 PM

I wonder how much its going to cost.

#19 OFFLINE   Tarun

    Lunarian

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,071 posts

Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:26 PM

CaPMan, on Aug 12 2005, 07:06 PM, said:

Notice to non-USA residents.

At this time, participation in the Windows OneCare Live Beta is open to U.S. residents only.
Tarun, how do you find out about all this kind of stuff?
Is it from intensive searching?
Or are you a participant of something to do with MS?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I'm actually an MS Beta tester. Anyone can check around the web and find info though.
    Currently enrolled in:
  • Data Protection Manager 2006 - A disk-based solution for data protection and recovery. More Info...

  • Windows Server 2003 R2 - The core of this release is built on the Windows Server 2003 SP1 platform and adds optionally installable components that our customers have been asking for.

  • Windows Driver Foundation - The Windows Driver Foundation is a new Windows driver model for both Kernel- and User-mode. It replaces the Windows Driver Framework program as it now includes a User-mode model as well and has subseq...

  • Installer 6.2 - Beta test of Installer.exe v6.2. (New, better compression.)

  • MSN Mobile - MSN Mobile Services


#20 OFFLINE   Capman

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,079 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 13 August 2005 - 12:00 AM

Tarun, on Aug 13 2005, 12:26 AM, said:

I'm actually an MS Beta tester.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


I thought it must be something like that.