When I started Defraggler it consumes almost all the CPU capacity. The WinXP desktop is nearly frozen.
Even when set the priority in TaskManager to "idle" all CPU power
is attracted by Defraggler.
I suggest to
a) Introduce a "Pause" button which suspends the defragmentation process until it is resumed again
and
b.) implement more cooperative multitasking. When another program requests some
CPU capacity then Defraggler should be willing to reduce its own share.
Thomas
1
"Pause" button resp. really low priority required
Started by thoste, Mar 15 2009 03:43 PM
1 reply to this topic
#2 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 71 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 15 March 2009 - 05:09 PM
thoste, on Mar 15 2009, 03:43 PM, said:
When I started Defraggler it consumes almost all the CPU capacity. The WinXP desktop is nearly frozen.
Even when set the priority in TaskManager to "idle" all CPU power
is attracted by Defraggler.
I suggest to
a) Introduce a "Pause" button which suspends the defragmentation process until it is resumed again
and
b.) implement more cooperative multitasking. When another program requests some
CPU capacity then Defraggler should be willing to reduce its own share.
Thomas
Even when set the priority in TaskManager to "idle" all CPU power
is attracted by Defraggler.
I suggest to
a) Introduce a "Pause" button which suspends the defragmentation process until it is resumed again
and
b.) implement more cooperative multitasking. When another program requests some
CPU capacity then Defraggler should be willing to reduce its own share.
Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Defraggler already has a pause button. When you open Defraggler look at the bottom of this program and you will see a pause button.
