Jump to content


Windows XP security tips


16 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Monalisa

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 19 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 31 January 2009 - 05:13 AM

There are general security tips that apply to all operating systems, of course, but each operating system platform provides its own security challenges. The following tips are tailored to Microsoft Windows XP.

1. Disable dangerous features. Microsoft Windows systems come with a number of features enabled by default that do little or nothing for convenience, but introduce significant security risks. Among these are Autorun, the Guest account, and even Automatic Updates — because letting someone in Redmond, WA decide when changes should be made to your system, when he has no idea what software you’re running and you haven’t tested the updates yet, is a bad idea. Microsoft Windows provides many features that are activated by default and either poorly conceived from a security perspective or, at best, unnecessary for the vast majority of users. Each of these features introduces its own risks, and any that you do not need should be deactivated.
2. Disable unneeded services. In addition to local operating system features, you should disable unneeded services. Almost exactly one year ago, my article 10 services to turn off in MS Windows XP provided a brief checklist of services to turn off — or to ensure you know why you’re leaving them on, at least. The list is not comprehensive, of course, but it is a good start.
3. Employ good email security practices. Make use of some basic email security tips to ensure you do not invite the bad guys to read your email, flood you with spam, and take advantage of you through phishing techniques.

For complete article click here

#2 OFFLINE   YoKenny

    Super Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oshawa, Ont. Canada
  • Interests:Helping people get rid of malware on their systems then showing them how not to get re-infected again

Posted 31 January 2009 - 05:39 AM

I take exception to your statement about Automatic updates.

Please read:
Huge increase' in worm attacks plague unpatched Windows PCs
http://forum.pirifor...showtopic=19870

At a minimum "Notify me but don't automatically download or install them." should be selected.

I view your signature bordering on spam!

--------------------

Gaming Computers
"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." - Albert Einstein
IE7Pro user

#3 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,328 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 31 January 2009 - 05:49 AM

View PostYoKenny, on Jan 30 2009, 11:39 PM, said:

I take exception to your statement about Automatic updates.
I agree, and I assume some of this is a copy+paste job from some "tweak info site." Much of the bulls**t propaganda surrounding Automatic Updates was at the beginning of XP when people distrusted Microsoft over their change of activation and having a service making an Internet connection daily - get over it already. If people would just leave that service running it would solve so many issues.

It gets even worse when some service techs have possession of a machine and think it's a "wise decision to disable it on clients computers."

...but it's your Windows installation and if you don't mind some malware slipping into an unpatched system....
Complexity of incoherent design.

#4 OFFLINE   1984

    CCleaner Lover

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 31 January 2009 - 01:42 PM

View PostYoKenny, on Jan 30 2009, 11:39 PM, said:

I take exception to your statement about Automatic updates.

Please read:
Huge increase' in worm attacks plague unpatched Windows PCs
http://forum.pirifor...showtopic=19870

At a minimum "Notify me but don't automatically download or install them." should be selected.

I view your signature bordering on spam!

--------------------

Gaming Computers


I agree, not recommended to turn off automatic updates. I always leave mine set to download and then I install after taking a look, mostly because I like to see what they came out with, not because i am worried that they will install something bad. If you have a legit op system and programs, you have nothing to worry about. ;)

#5 OFFLINE   kmillerusaf

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina

Posted 31 January 2009 - 03:36 PM

View PostAndavari, on Jan 31 2009, 12:49 AM, said:

It gets even worse when some service techs have possession of a machine and think it's a "wise decision to disable it on clients computers."

...but it's your Windows installation and if you don't mind some malware slipping into an unpatched system....

I agree with part of this Andavari. I think it's a great idea to keep your system patched, however, what about those updates that have negative affects on your computer... Like the ones that have affected security programs like EPS and ZoneAlarm. Anyone ever had problems with the KB956803 or KB951748 patches? It basically kills the internet connection computers with either of these 2 software firewalls. If someone had automatically download/install updates on, they would never know that the updates caused the problem if they were an average user. Is this Microsoft's fault for not testing their updates, especially with a major firewall program like ZA? Sure... But we as users need to be aware of this and not jump on the train as soon as they are released in my opinion.
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.

Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal



#6 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,328 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 31 January 2009 - 08:10 PM

True, however Microsoft does automatically have a System Restore point made when installing updates to undo any possible issues. It's also up to the end-user to at least look at the updates that will be installed, however we are talking about Windows and bugs do exist and will remain existing.
Complexity of incoherent design.

#7 OFFLINE   kmillerusaf

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina

Posted 31 January 2009 - 08:25 PM

True, installing updates does create a system restore point... Just thinking to myself how many average users know that fact or know what a system restore point is? :unsure: I do agree with you though, it should be on the user to know what is being installed. However in a situation like that with Microsoft updates... You think something is helping your computer become more secure, but it is really bumping heads with your security software.
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.

Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal



#8 OFFLINE   Rorschach112

    Power Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,029 posts

Posted 31 January 2009 - 09:29 PM

There is a tutorial here about Security Tips

http://forum.pirifor...showtopic=20214
By the power of truth, I, while living, have conquered the universe.

~Scratch~


#9 OFFLINE   kmillerusaf

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina

Posted 31 January 2009 - 10:08 PM

Rorschach112,

Great post... I was reading the one about the Malware Removal Universities as well. I am actually a freshman (as of 1/29/2009) at Malware Removal University and if you'll let me, I'd like to help here eventually when and if I become proficient at malware removal. I guess only time will tell.

Take Care,
Keith
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.

Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal



#10 OFFLINE   DennisD

    Just another volunteer

  • Moderators
  • 7,931 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England: NE Coast

Posted 01 February 2009 - 12:40 PM

View Postkmillerusaf, on Jan 31 2009, 10:08 PM, said:

Rorschach112,

Great post... I was reading the one about the Malware Removal Universities as well. I am actually a freshman (as of 1/29/2009) at Malware Removal University and if you'll let me, I'd like to help here eventually when and if I become proficient at malware removal. I guess only time will tell.

Take Care,
Keith

Good luck with that Keith.

#11 OFFLINE   kmillerusaf

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina

Posted 01 February 2009 - 02:18 PM

Thank you Dennis ;)
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.

Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal



#12 OFFLINE   hazelnut

    try to stay calm

  • Moderators
  • 9,460 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Huddersfield uk

Posted 01 February 2009 - 03:35 PM

Just to add my best wishes too Keith. :)
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE

http://www.piriform.com/docs

#13 OFFLINE   kmillerusaf

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 431 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:South Carolina

Posted 01 February 2009 - 03:40 PM

Thanks hazelnut... I hope it goes smoothly and as quickly as possible so I can help people the right way. Malware just keeps getting worse. I really like this forum so it would be nice to help out here eventually in that regard. Small, tight knit community with great software products!
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.

Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal



#14 OFFLINE   DJpailo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 308 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 01 February 2009 - 07:16 PM

I disabled Windows Update. I check neowin everyday and they always remind me about the updates. I prefer it like that because if you get notifications, you tell the notification that you'll download them later and then it keeps coming up over and over again.

#15 OFFLINE   YoKenny

    Super Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oshawa, Ont. Canada
  • Interests:Helping people get rid of malware on their systems then showing them how not to get re-infected again

Posted 01 February 2009 - 08:18 PM

Quote

you tell the notification that you'll download them later and then it keeps coming up over and over again.

It is easy to click on it to tell you later I believe.

Maybe a Poll would be handy as to favorite Windows Update information sites and method?

I have never visited the netwin forum as it is rated Yellow by McAfee SiteAdvisor but general comments rate the forum OK but any site that harbors Messenger Plus! 3 & Sponsor (MsgPlusLive-470.exe) deserves a RED rating in my books as that adware is just nasty:
http://www.siteadvis...tes/msgplus.net
"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." - Albert Einstein
IE7Pro user

#16 OFFLINE   1984

    CCleaner Lover

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 01 February 2009 - 10:44 PM

PFFFFT! lol............don't believe everything you read. the sky isn't falling just because siteadvisor says so....;)

#17 OFFLINE   Andavari

    Captain Spectacular

  • Moderators
  • 13,328 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Shadow Moses

Posted 02 February 2009 - 12:20 AM

View Post1984, on Feb 1 2009, 04:44 PM, said:

don't believe everything you read. the sky isn't falling just because siteadvisor says so....;)
SiteAdvisor isn't always 100% correct either, like labeling a whole download site that hosts all sorts of downloads from GPL, freeware, adware, etc., that are usually clearly labeled as such on the sites.
Complexity of incoherent design.