Jump to content


Descripency in "bytes to be removed" and "bytes removed"


8 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Evan

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 19 January 2009 - 01:39 AM

Hi,

I find when I run the cleaner Analyze, it will say it has something like 50MB to remove, but when I Run Cleaner it only says it removed 7MB (example values only). If I run Analyze again after that is says there is nothing to be removed.

Seems a strange discrepancy. Any ideas?

Evan

#2 OFFLINE   Disk4mat

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mesa, AZ

Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:03 AM

Deleted by Disk4mat

#3 OFFLINE   onDvine

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:52 PM

View PostDisk4mat, on Jan 19 2009, 01:03 AM, said:

... I do think though that this topic should be reviewed by the devs to determine what causes the different sizes reported and see if there is a way to bring them closer inline or... Just offer an explanation and use the term 'Estimated xxx will be cleaned...'
That would be nice. I started a thread on the subject at DSLR this morning and another member directed me to this thread, here. :)

#4 OFFLINE   Disk4mat

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 568 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Mesa, AZ

Posted 20 January 2009 - 09:53 AM

Deleted by Disk4mat

#5 OFFLINE   onDvine

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 20 January 2009 - 03:47 PM

View PostDisk4mat, on Jan 20 2009, 01:53 AM, said:

I can confirm the size difference in relation to the WMI log.
Thank you, Disk4mat. :D I'm not sure if the difference is always that same amount on the Vista box my husband uses or not. As I said at DSLR, the exact amount analyzed is always removed from my WinXP. Hope the moderators here will bring this topic to the attention of the developers, as you suggested. A 16MB difference is too big to be regarded as an approximation.

#6 OFFLINE   hazelnut

    try to stay calm

  • Moderators
  • 9,461 posts
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Huddersfield uk

Posted 20 January 2009 - 04:27 PM

View PostonDvine, on Jan 20 2009, 03:47 PM, said:

Hope the moderators here will bring this topic to the attention of the developers, as you suggested.


Done :)
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND HERE

http://www.piriform.com/docs

#7 OFFLINE   onDvine

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 20 January 2009 - 06:50 PM

View Posthazelnut, on Jan 20 2009, 08:27 AM, said:

Done :)
Thank you, hazelnut. :D

#8 OFFLINE   Evan

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 6 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 01:57 AM

Just some further information. The section that doesn't seem to match between analysis and cleaning is "System - Temporary Files".

It seems to be no cleaning up files in C:\Documents and Settings\user\Local Settings\Temp although it lists them in the initial analysis.

E.

#9 OFFLINE   onDvine

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 01 July 2010 - 02:16 AM

View PostEvan, on 01 July 2010 - 01:57 AM, said:

... It seems to be no cleaning up files in C:\Documents and Settings\user\Local Settings\Temp although it lists them in the initial analysis. ...
That sounds exactly opposite of the situation I posted about. If you follow the link in the 3rd post (mine) above, it shows more files are being cleaned than are being shown in the initial analysis. :mellow: