New Thread
Started by Mike Rochip, Jul 29 2005 03:37 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 03:37 AM
Would anyone be interested in reading or contributing to a thread about humorous, frustrating, unbelievable, etc. computer stories, problems, web sites, and such?
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 04:46 AM
If you want to read frustrating computer problems. Check out the Hijack this and spyware hell sections.
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 05:17 AM
ya... especially the hijack-this section... is such a headaches...
--==aGumon==--
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 10:14 AM
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 03:27 PM
Mike Rochip, on Jul 29 2005, 06:14 AM, said:
LOL, GAVE ME A LAUGH AT WORK, THEN I HAD TO SHOW OTHERS HERE THE STORY, OH, IF I WAS CONVICTED ON EVERY THREAT I MADE AGAINST INANIMATE(sp) OBJECTS THEN I'D BE LOCKED UP FOR QUITE A WHILE.
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 09:07 PM
Newhotness, on Jul 29 2005, 09:27 AM, said:
LOL, GAVE ME A LAUGH AT WORK, THEN I HAD TO SHOW OTHERS HERE THE STORY, OH, IF I WAS CONVICTED ON EVERY THREAT I MADE AGAINST INANIMATE(sp) OBJECTS THEN I'D BE LOCKED UP FOR QUITE A WHILE.
You may enjoy this one then...
BBC News
Both these incedents happened here in Colorado (my home state) Coincedence
Closer to home (pun) imagine my surprise to find that while trying to find a solution to "visited links not changing color in Firefox" for my benefit and momnpopdays (see "firefox" in the Software Forum) I type ["visited links" +firefox] into Google and one of my idiotic, unhelpfull posts in reply turns up in the results 4 RESULTS DOWN OUT OF 3,340 WITH CCleaner Forums ->Firefox AS THE TITLE.
If you look at my posts, you will see I often post and then reply to myself with some kind of rambling, moronic, and wrong solution. Fortunately, DjLizard must be very understanding or maybe just didn't notice.
BTW, If I ever implied my computer was inanimate it would most likely burst into flames, fall on me, or at least crash (into my car).
Inanimate objects will never be happy until we are*
*inanamite, that is
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 29 July 2005 - 10:41 PM
lol. I've been playing it cool lately.
but...
in-animate. think of how animation's animated
inanimate.
There, now you'll never spell that wrong again.
but...
in-animate. think of how animation's animated
inanimate.
There, now you'll never spell that wrong again.
Click here if CCleaner Issues are re-appearing
DjLizard.net
DjLizard.net wiki
Dial-a-fix
Dial-a-fix tips
DjLizard.net software support forum
Do you live in Bradenton, Sarasota, Tampa, or St. Petersburg, Florida? Visit Digital Doctors where I work :)
DjLizard.net
DjLizard.net wiki
Dial-a-fix
Dial-a-fix tips
DjLizard.net software support forum
Do you live in Bradenton, Sarasota, Tampa, or St. Petersburg, Florida? Visit Digital Doctors where I work :)
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 30 July 2005 - 12:29 AM
DjLizard, on Jul 29 2005, 04:41 PM, said:
lol. I've been playing it cool lately.
but...
in-animate. think of how animation's animated
inanimate.
There, now you'll never spell that wrong again.
but...
in-animate. think of how animation's animated
inanimate.
There, now you'll never spell that wrong again.
Curses
My Dad was a high school teacher and grammar and spelling were within his domain. I was determined never to make a mistake under your watchful eye. Arrogantly
My Dad's peeve was the misuse of apostraphes, as in two pizza's for the price of one...
I did catch grammer while proof reading...
Kelsey would be proud!












