dBan
Started by Tom AZ, Dec 31 2008 05:23 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 31 December 2008 - 05:23 AM
How does DBAN compare with Eraser? Is it a favorable alternative -- or are the completely different?
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 31 December 2008 - 06:18 AM
I've never used DBAN myself yet, however from the description alone it's a boot and nuke disk for wiping hard disks clean, that includes any data on the disk too. Whereas Eraser can be used inside of Windows itself as a normal file shredder or for wiping the free space on disks.
The Eraser installation version includes DBAN if my memory serves me correct.
Edit:
With DBAN if you have lets say a secondary hard disk that you don't want touched it would probably be a good ideal to unplug it.
The Eraser installation version includes DBAN if my memory serves me correct.
Edit:
With DBAN if you have lets say a secondary hard disk that you don't want touched it would probably be a good ideal to unplug it.
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 01 January 2009 - 03:30 AM
I was suggested to use DBAN but I tried installing it to my USB Flash Drive and it came up with an odd error (was a little error window, totally blank).
So I skipped it and used Seagates own software.
So I skipped it and used Seagates own software.
Yorkshireman
- [My Twitter Profile: Clicky]
- [My Twitter Profile: Clicky]
QUOTE
Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions.
Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
#4 OFFLINE
#5 OFFLINE
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 26 January 2009 - 07:04 PM
Tom AZ, on Jan 2 2009, 12:45 AM, said:
I think it is. At least that's what I understood from my reading on their site.
To confirm
DBAN is supposed to be used from a bootable disk. I use it every so often at work. Have tried several different wipe utilities like GWipe and DBAN
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.
Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal
Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal
#7 OFFLINE
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 26 January 2009 - 10:35 PM
Andavari, on Jan 26 2009, 05:25 PM, said:
Those are the same thing. 
Darik's Boot And Nuke = DBAN
Darik's Boot And Nuke = DBAN
HAHAHA! Don't I sound stupid. My apologies everyone! But you get my point, it's run off of boot disks
There's always an exception to the rule. I'm that exception.
Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal
Desktop ----- AMD Athlon 3700+ (2.64Ghz), 2GB DDR 400, ASUS A8N-SLI Premium, 500GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP3, Avira Antivir Personal
At work ----- Intel C2D T1700 (1.6Ghz), 2GB DDR2 667, Dell OUY141, 80GB HD, Windows XP Pro SP2, Symantec 10
Laptop ----- Intel C2D P8400 (2.4 Ghz), 4GB DDR3 1066, Mainboard, 160GB HD, Dualboot: Windows 7/openSUSE 11.1, Avira Antivir Personal












