Jump to content


Opera 9.6


16 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   TeeJay3800

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Metro Detroit

Posted 08 October 2008 - 09:03 PM

Opera version 9.6 has just been released. I won't bother listing all the updates and additions since that's available on opera.com, but what I wanted to mention is the SPEED. Thus far, I had stuck with browsers that use IE's engine simply because of how fast it was. Firefox and Opera always seemed much slower to me. Now with 9.6, Opera is a speed demon! Page load times have dramatically decreased, so for those of you who haven't tried Opera, or have switched to something else, now is a great time to give the latest version a try!
Dell Latitude D600
Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit SP1

Posted Image

#2 OFFLINE   DennisD

    Just another volunteer

  • Moderators
  • 7,920 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England: NE Coast

Posted 08 October 2008 - 10:02 PM

I've been using it since this morning (UK time). Not sure yet if it's faster than 9.52, but it certainly isn't any slower.

#3 OFFLINE   Anthony A

    POSIMO

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,101 posts

Posted 08 October 2008 - 10:11 PM

View PostDennisD, on Oct 8 2008, 06:02 PM, said:

I've been using it since this morning (UK time). Not sure yet if it's faster than 9.52, but it certainly isn't any slower.

I didn't notice a speed difference either from 9.52. Some one who has not use Opera since before the 9.5 release will be very surprised though with the speed increase from previous versions of Opera. Opera 9.5+ is very fast compared to anything under 9.5.

#4 OFFLINE   1984

    CCleaner Lover

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,605 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada

Posted 09 October 2008 - 12:04 AM

does it finally work for vista 64X ?

#5 OFFLINE   CeeCee

    Wait a minute, who am I here?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,210 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland
  • Interests:Movies, my computer

Posted 11 October 2008 - 08:15 AM

View PostDennisD, on Oct 8 2008, 10:02 PM, said:

Not sure yet if it's faster than 9.52, but it certainly isn't any slower.
Yep. I don't think it's any faster, at least not very much.

#6 OFFLINE   Anthony A

    POSIMO

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,101 posts

Posted 11 October 2008 - 04:35 PM

It sounds like Tejay3800 hasn't used Opera in a while and in that case it doesn't surprise me that he finds 9.60 fast. There has been a huge speed increase since the 9.50 version compared to previous versions that he was using.

#7 OFFLINE   TeeJay3800

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Metro Detroit

Posted 12 October 2008 - 04:53 AM

View PostAnthony A, on Oct 11 2008, 12:35 PM, said:

It sounds like Tejay3800 hasn't used Opera in a while and in that case it doesn't surprise me that he finds 9.60 fast. There has been a huge speed increase since the 9.50 version compared to previous versions that he was using.
You're right, I hadn't used it in several months...since version 9.27 or so. Maybe the speed difference started with version 9.5 and not 9.6, but I think my recommendation is still valid. It's a remarkably fast browser! B)
Dell Latitude D600
Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit SP1

Posted Image

#8 OFFLINE   CeeCee

    Wait a minute, who am I here?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,210 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland
  • Interests:Movies, my computer

Posted 12 October 2008 - 09:06 AM

http://my.opera.com/...008/10/09/obama

Modified version: http://img56.imagesh...ackoperahg7.jpg

#9 OFFLINE   YoKenny

    Super Power User

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,874 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oshawa, Ont. Canada
  • Interests:Helping people get rid of malware on their systems then showing them how not to get re-infected again

Posted 12 October 2008 - 10:12 AM

That Don't Impress Me Much

It does not support McAfee SiteAdvisor nor Web of Trust ( WoT )
"Education is what remains after one has forgotten everything he learned in school." - Albert Einstein
IE7Pro user

#10 OFFLINE   CeeCee

    Wait a minute, who am I here?

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,210 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Finland
  • Interests:Movies, my computer

Posted 12 October 2008 - 10:53 AM

View PostYoKenny, on Oct 12 2008, 10:12 AM, said:

It does not support McAfee SiteAdvisor nor Web of Trust ( WoT )
That's true, but Opera's Fraud Protection protects against malware sites too. At least against some of them.

http://www.opera.com...raudprotection/

Protection against malware Web sites is also part of Opera Fraud Protection.

#11 OFFLINE   Tunerz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philippines
  • Interests:No idea

Posted 12 October 2008 - 01:24 PM

I'm currently testing Opera 9.60 Portable. I don't see much improvement in terms of performance compared to Firefox Portable 3.1b2pre.

#12 OFFLINE   Anthony A

    POSIMO

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,101 posts

Posted 12 October 2008 - 03:18 PM

View PostTunerz, on Oct 12 2008, 09:24 AM, said:

I'm currently testing Opera 9.60 Portable. I don't see much improvement in terms of performance compared to Firefox Portable 3.1b2pre.
Thats because they are both very fast.

#13 OFFLINE   TeeJay3800

    Power Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 675 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Metro Detroit

Posted 13 October 2008 - 01:27 AM

View PostYoKenny, on Oct 12 2008, 06:12 AM, said:

It does not support McAfee SiteAdvisor nor Web of Trust ( WoT )
I already mentioned this to Kenny on a different forum, but for the benefit of anyone who may read this, WOT has a bookmarklet for Opera and Safari that works very nicely.

http://www.mywot.com/en/blog/wot-bookmarkl...afari-and-opera
Dell Latitude D600
Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit SP1

Posted Image

#14 OFFLINE   Tunerz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philippines
  • Interests:No idea

Posted 13 October 2008 - 09:11 AM

View PostAnthony A, on Oct 12 2008, 11:18 PM, said:

That's because they are both very fast.
Well, I guess it will be a tough time choosing the one to keep. I always thought Opera would always be faster than Firefox without the help of benchmarks. Now I don't see the difference in the naked eye. :mellow:

#15 OFFLINE   Anthony A

    POSIMO

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,101 posts

Posted 13 October 2008 - 02:03 PM

View PostTunerz, on Oct 13 2008, 05:11 AM, said:

Well, I guess it will be a tough time choosing the one to keep. I always thought Opera would always be faster than Firefox without the help of benchmarks. Now I don't see the difference in the naked eye. :mellow:
why do you think you need to get rid of one? Keep both. I have FF2 and 3, Opera 9.60, Maxthon 1 and 2, Avant, and IE7 with IE 7 Pro on my machines. I keep up on all of them.

#16 OFFLINE   DennisD

    Just another volunteer

  • Moderators
  • 7,920 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:England: NE Coast

Posted 13 October 2008 - 02:50 PM

View PostTunerz, on Oct 13 2008, 09:11 AM, said:

Well, I guess it will be a tough time choosing the one to keep. I always thought Opera would always be faster than Firefox without the help of benchmarks. Now I don't see the difference in the naked eye. :mellow:

I agree with Anthony. I use Opera almost exclusively now, but if I want to download a large (1gb ish) file, I launch Firefox and use the "DownThemAll" download manager extension, which for me is far superior to Opera's built in one. Apart from that, I don't use FF at all, but I wouldn't get rid of it.

#17 OFFLINE   Tunerz

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 490 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Philippines
  • Interests:No idea

Posted 15 October 2008 - 11:35 AM

Well I run into space problems in my flash disk/MP3 player with 2GB capacity. I stack it up with 200mb+ installers so choosing what is better in performance is the goal I'm currently looking for.