3 replies to this topic

[Para_50]

Well, I have downloaded this latest version BUT from what I've read so far, it sounds like I need to try the older version 1st.

No problem, I've found it & will install it after I uninstall the 103 version. I'll post here what I think of it, in the very near future (or sooner, if it fights with me! LOL).

I'm not a newbie to this forum as I've been using CC & Recuva for long time & they're both Supreme programs. So my expectation for Defraggler is HIGH...

Cheerio
Para

[Keithuk]

Welcome to Piriform Para.

Para_50, on Oct 8 2008, 02:24 AM, said:

Well, I have downloaded this latest version BUT from what I've read so far, it sounds like I need to try the older version 1st.

You can download any of the older versions of CC, Recuva or Defraggler at FileHippo.

http://www.filehippo...oad_defraggler/

[Para_50]

Well I was very impressed for the 1st 45 minutes of running Defraggler. But 8 HOURS LATER... when it Finally finished defragging my C: hard drive [250GB BUT Only 28GB filled] which is only 2 months old -- I am Not Impressed!

I have a trial program from PC TOOL called 'PC Tools Disk Suite', which took only 22 minutes to defrag same hard drive 3 weeks ago. It had 26GB filled at that time. And looking back at previous Defrags done on my old hard drive [60GB, with 35GB filled] when I used MS built in Defrag program, well, I'm just not impressed at all!

Having said that, I will wait a couple of weeks & try Defraggler again. I do a lot of testing of new programs (some beta), which involves a lot of installing, un-installing, re-installing -- so on, so forth. So I need to defrag my hard drive to keep it running the best it can.

1st impression count for any program to be successful in the market & well... you all know how that goes. Must I say any more...

"Keep on Trucking", as my 'Fairy God Mother' (passed on ) used to tell me!

Para

[Keithuk]

Sorry Para I can't use Defraggler on Win98 so I can't comment on how efficient it is.