What type of Firewall do you use?
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 03:33 PM
#2 OFFLINE
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 04:35 PM
IE7Pro user
#4 ONLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 09:13 PM
How To Get Into Safe Mode | Returnil 2008 | Sandboxie | ERUNT GUI | TestDisk | MiniTool Partition Wizard - Home Edition
#5 OFFLINE
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 01:59 AM
Comodo has Defense Plus Host Intrusion Prevention System.
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 05:45 AM
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 12 September 2008 - 10:16 AM
Jamin4u, on Sep 4 2008, 09:59 PM, said:
I thought I would try Comodo firewall on my XP Pro SP3 system and I must say that I am totally un-impressed!
1. It installed the Ask toolbar without my permission and prior knowledge that it would be installed and activated.
2. It detected several false positives such as SDFIX.exe that I had downloaded myself and a Microsoft Windows SP3 fix.
I only let it run for a short while until I became totally disgusted by the false positives it found.
I eradicated it from my system.
I have read about Comodo's rampant false positives but I am amazed at how true the claims are.
By the way, I do not like a software based firewall as it is a total waste of system resources and so says a MBAM developer in a 10 minute video that I wrote about in the CCleaner forum:
http://forum.pirifor...showtopic=17348
IE7Pro user
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 13 September 2008 - 01:08 AM
YoKenny, on Sep 12 2008, 03:16 AM, said:
1. It installed the Ask toolbar without my permission and prior knowledge that it would be installed and activated.
Quote
2. It detected several false positives such as SDFIX.exe that I had downloaded myself and a Microsoft Windows SP3 fix.
Quote
- CFP now provides an option to scan for viruses during the installation and from its graphical user interface.
Comodos Antivirus is still in Beta. I didn't scan during install. Its a manual scan from the Gui. I don't recommend using it.
There's a learning curve and some tricks for setting it up. I set the Defense + Security level to Clean PC Mode For about one week, so I could run all of my programs to let Comodo learn them. You will acquire pending files during this time, I just purged them.
Quote
After running all programs, move the setting to Safe Mode. No pending files in this mode.
Quote
I set programs that I trust to trusted applications to cut down on pop-ups.
I set update programs to Installer/Updater to allow elevated privilege.
During regular definition updates there is no need to switch to installation mode. But when you lets say install a new version of CCleaner over and existing version you will need to switch to installation mode.
I eradicated it from my system.
I almost did the same.
This program is for people who want total control over what each program can do on their system.
Quote
Bulletproof protection against root-kits, inter-process memory injections, key-loggers and more
Authenticates the integrity of every program before allowing it to load into your computer's memory
Alerts you every time an unknown or untrusted application attempts to run or install
Blocks Viruses, Trojans and Spyware before they can ever get onto your system
Prevents unauthorized modification of critical operating system files and registry entries
For both the Firewall and HIPS it uses about 10 megs of ram on my XP and Vista systems.
#10 OFFLINE
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 13 September 2008 - 09:16 AM
davey, on Sep 13 2008, 04:25 AM, said:
The three wise men attend the baby Jesus and present their gifts and are gathered around when Joseph asks "How come you wealthy folk attend here with your clothes all covered in soot and grime?" Where one of the magi replies "We came from afar followin yonder star."
Its a big hit down in the US Southern States at Christmas time.
IE7Pro user
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 26 September 2008 - 08:12 AM
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 02 October 2008 - 01:25 AM
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 18 October 2008 - 07:46 PM
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 19 October 2008 - 06:02 AM
Windows XP> "software firewall".
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 19 October 2008 - 06:29 AM
craigathus, on Oct 19 2008, 06:02 AM, said:
Windows XP> "software firewall".
10-18-08:
I Used (On 5 Different Computers ) Zone Alarm Firewall---Free Version----Latest Version 8.0.020.000 Since Its Beginning----Never Any Problems...I Recommned It --- Have Installed It On Friends Computers...
Vincent Auto
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 30 October 2008 - 01:23 AM
rridgely, on Sep 4 2008, 07:33 AM, said:
I use ZoneAlarm Firewall and i recommended it. The free verson provides advance features and the pro verson is even better.
FOR MORE INFORMATION PLZ READ THREAD - http://forum.pirifor...showtopic=18359
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 31 October 2008 - 04:56 PM
AJ
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 08 November 2008 - 01:39 PM
The Netgear Modem gives better speed than the Thomson Speedtouch I previously used.
Given perfect security, and freedom from errors by users, nothing nasty should come on-board.
If any keyloggers get in, or if the P.C. is recruited into a BotNet army, software Firewalls give much better protection against "outgoing" than hardware firewalls.
I like the fact that the hardware Firewall uses zero computer resources to block most of the attacks.
BUT I have more confidence in Comodo.
I have read that Hardware SIPS give more stringent protection than Software without SIPS.
I do NOT trust SIPS.
My Comodo rules are quite restrictive, but they never interfere with legitimate traffic.
The only time a software download failed was when I tried to update the Netgear Wireless adapter.
I discovered that Netgear tried to download to a port different from the port I used to request the update.
I then found that if I initiate an outgoing link to an IP address, any packets from that address are considered by the hardware to be replies to an outgoing request, and hardware lets them through - even if they are the wrong protocol. It even allows incoming ICMP just because of an outgoing TCP or UDP packet. I strongly suspect that anything aimed at a Privileged Port would succeed in taking over my P.C.
The Comodo Firewall has a stricter policy - the reply has to be aimed at the port that issued the request, and it has to be the same protocol, otherwise it is NOT a reply to outgoing, but is an unrequested incoming that should be blocked.
I am careful what sites I visit, and avoid any which Google warns could damage my computer, BUT when a site is first infected Google will not warn, and I think that Hardware SIPS will welcome any malware that is available, BUT Comodo will protect me.
Regards
Alan
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 19 November 2008 - 02:30 AM












