What Anti-Virus do you use
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 03:30 PM
#2 OFFLINE
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 04:40 PM
I would use Norton only if it were the only anti virus application available and I had a system with large amounts of RAM to squander to its needs.
IE7Pro user
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 05:42 PM
Andavari, on Sep 4 2008, 10:43 AM, said:
Edit: Actually you didn't, my bad.
Sorry, I probably did(you can still post in it.)
I was reading a post in this part of the forum and then noticed those topics again and remembered that I meant to restart them.
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 06:24 PM
But everything else is free.
AJ
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 07:41 PM
CTskifreak, on Sep 4 2008, 02:24 PM, said:
But everything else is free.
AJ
No problem with paying for software but Norton you couldn't pay me to use.
AntiVir on most machines and Avast on another. I much prefer AntiVir though.
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 04 September 2008 - 09:11 PM
How To Get Into Safe Mode | Returnil 2008 | Sandboxie | ERUNT GUI | TestDisk | MiniTool Partition Wizard - Home Edition
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 02:24 AM
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 05:44 AM
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 06:33 AM
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 10:18 AM
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 11:42 AM
Besides, they would only get in the way of all that lovely malware I'm constantly downloading.
Virus Bulletin - Latest AV Test Results
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 12:33 PM
Seriously, I use Avast, because I like pirate language.
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 04:21 PM
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2008 - 08:03 PM
Keithuk, on Mar 31 2008, 08:34 PM, said:
For 12 years I've been using McAfee in its various versions, 4.5, 6.01, 7.01 and 2006 10.0. I could download and install the updates as regular as I wanted too. Then last October when you downloaded and tried to update you get the message back can't find any McAfee products. So I bought McAfee 2006 v10.0 and installed that thinking it needed a newer version, no the same error came back.
So I downloaded AVG Free Edition 7.5.488, uninstalled McAfee. Installed AVG and downloaded the latest update and did a full scan. It picked up a virus (I can't remember the name or type) that I had in a zip file. Now this is something that McAfee couldn't find.
Now I never have my virus checker running all the time because they use up a lot of resources. I was on the web the other day, on a serial number site and it said it needed to download an ActiveX so the page/site would work. I clicked Yes and it did something for a few seconds then carried on. I get a popup from AVG said a virus spotted in Temporary Internet Files and it removed it. Now if the virus checker isn't enabled in any way how did it pick this suspect ActiveX up?
So for me I would recommend the AVG Free Edition, exellent.
Now I checked out AntiVir today at it appears its only for WinNT systems so that one is out.
Now I also posted in the old topic that AVG were stopping support and updates for 7.5 at the end of August. Now they have decided to postponed the demise of 7.5.
http://freeforum.avg...0,backpage=,sv=
until more users start using v8.0
Now I read a post on here this lunchtime Why use Defraggler? and davey posted a link to http://donnedwards.o...bel/Thumbs%20Up which talks about Defraggler and Is Your Anti-Virus Program Working?.
Now the EICAR test file talks about making a test file in NotePad and saving it as a *.com file. Now I made this file 7 years ago after reading the McAfee help file and it worked then.
X5O!P%@AP[4\PZX54(P^)7CC)7}$EICAR-STANDARD-ANTIVIRUS-TEST-FILE!$H+H*
Just copy and paste this into NotePad and save it as a Virus.com or any name providing it has a .com extension then scan the file or folder to see if you virus checker picks it up.
Now at work we use McAfee 8.5 and I made a test file and scanned it but nothing showed up. So I downloaded the test file from the External links at the bottom and tried to unzip eicar.com but it wouldn't let me because its a virus threat. Now I don't know what the difference is between my file and eicar.com they are both 68 bytes as stated. But the file is still picked up as a virus threat, try your virus checkers to see what they report.
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 06 September 2008 - 04:22 AM
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 06 September 2008 - 06:55 AM
These are the only ones that us low RAM users can use without serious slow down.
Some small company is going to take over the "New World" market for security on these new tiny systems. They are going to get a good bit of the market share because of this. That is if one of the "Big, Big Guys" doesn't pickup the ball and run with it.
The one that protects the most "little guys" is going to pickup a big piece of change.
Let's face it, there are a few billion "little guys" running around Asia right now.
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 06 September 2008 - 03:10 PM
Keithuk, on Sep 5 2008, 02:03 PM, said:
If anyone is trying out a new AV scanner they should always test it using EICAR which is a 100% safe way to test out resident protection, and on-demand scanning. That way they'll know beforehand how their AV or other anti-malware will react to a possible real infection, if/when that happens.
davey, on Sep 6 2008, 12:55 AM, said:
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 06 September 2008 - 03:49 PM
Andavari, on Sep 6 2008, 03:10 PM, said:
I know that its at the bottom of wikipedia.org I was just quoting Davey link.
As I've said this test text is nothing new I read it in the McAfee help file 7 years ago.












