Spyware Remover Apps
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 03:24 AM
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 04:45 AM
http://www.spywarewa...nti-spyware.htm
Besides the others that you listed I use:
A squared free
Spyware Doctor
Ewido
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 06:50 AM
LEEnoble, on Jun 26 2005, 07:24 PM, said:
I am not trying to be a smart a$$ but no adware is not on the list any more
Quote
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 07:42 AM
I feel secure with just ad-aware and spybot installed. The only programs I have running resident are my AV, FW, and UPS shutdown software.
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 03:43 PM
*spybot s&d v1.4
*windows antispy
along with spywareblaster...
i tried the trial version of spysweeper... but very disapointedly... it pick up a file of citect and said it is a piece of spyware/adware...
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 07:43 PM
kcmasterpeice2002, on Jun 27 2005, 02:50 AM, said:
But i agree you should remove it right away
No problem, to be honest I havent read that list in a while I knew that it was on the list at one time though.
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 07:45 PM
Spyware removers I use:
* Ad-Aware SE Personal
* Spybot - Search & Destroy
* CWShredder
Spyware prevention I use:
* SpywareBlaster
* SpywareGuard
* ZoneAlarm Firewall (free edition)
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 08:05 PM
DjLizard.net
DjLizard.net wiki
Dial-a-fix
Dial-a-fix tips
DjLizard.net software support forum
Do you live in Bradenton, Sarasota, Tampa, or St. Petersburg, Florida? Visit Digital Doctors where I work :)
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 09:18 PM
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 27 June 2005 - 09:21 PM
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 29 June 2005 - 10:49 PM
rridgely, on Jun 27 2005, 01:21 PM, said:
Why dont one of the spyware experts find out
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 29 June 2005 - 11:52 PM
kcmasterpeice2002, on Jun 29 2005, 06:49 PM, said:
That programs so crappy cnet didnt even give it a rating. Plus it costs $30.00 and did you read the reviews? Hopefully no one ever uses that program.
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 30 June 2005 - 02:39 AM
kcmasterpeice2002, on Jun 29 2005, 02:49 PM, said:












