Registry Cleaner
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 20 August 2007 - 10:51 PM
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 20 August 2007 - 10:56 PM
#3 ONLINE
Posted 20 August 2007 - 11:14 PM
You have to be a bit careful with registry cleaners, and Tuneup is probably a good piece of software, although I've never used it.
Unless you know what you're doing, some cleaners can be a bit too aggressive and could cause you problems. IMHO, I would just stick with CCleaner for now.
I think most people on here use it, and I've never had a problem after using it. And it's free.
Hope this helps.
How To Get Into Safe Mode | Returnil 2008 | Sandboxie | ERUNT GUI | TestDisk | MiniTool Partition Wizard - Home Edition
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 20 August 2007 - 11:20 PM
The local computer shops use so it must OK
CCleaner is ok but i would stay away from the beta 2.0 until it is out of BETA
AIRPORT101
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 01:26 AM
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 01:29 AM
Glad we could help
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 01:31 AM
I use CCleaner's issues scanner when I uninstall software and thats about it. Been a couple years now and zero problems.
I will have to say that I got a trial of registry mechanic from pc tools and it seems pretty safe too. I've been using it since vnunet gave it away many months ago and its never caused any problems. Other than those 2 I wouldnt trust any others.
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 03:05 AM
Linda Sands, on Aug 20 2007, 10:51 PM, said:
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 04:47 AM
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 07:24 AM
If you want to optimize the registry try NTREGOPT, just make sure you also get ERUNT with it located here.
There's also Free Registry Defrag which is also safe and shows you beforehand if a registry optimization is really necessary or not, if the optimization is at or below 2% you're completely wasting your time optimizing the registry.
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 08:14 AM
RegSeeker is very good and powerful. That's why you have to be careful, what you decide to delete.
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 08:41 AM
CeeCee, on Aug 21 2007, 03:14 AM, said:
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 09:48 AM
Andavari, on Aug 21 2007, 04:41 AM, said:
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 11:37 AM
I have never ever had any problems with it, and it does the job.
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 21 August 2007 - 01:11 PM
Thou I haven't had use the back up yet.
Craig.
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 22 August 2007 - 02:25 AM
1. No discernable speed different is apparent to any user when they "cleaned" their registry
2. Registry defragmentation is nonsense
2a. So called "registry optimisation" is nonsense and on vista utilities that change things like the tcp window recieve size will messup what the all new tcpip stack in Vista does automatically
3. Developers use the regsitry for purposes it should not be used quite often and it is impossible for anyone else to determine the true function of all possible registry entrys - thinking you do is just ignorant
4. 90% of all registry "problems" can be fixed without users going in there
5. CCleaner has a safe registry tool for those who must fiddle and play
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 22 August 2007 - 05:06 AM
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 22 August 2007 - 05:06 AM
#19 OFFLINE
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 22 August 2007 - 03:41 PM
I favour the 1.3 version myself.
(At least it used to be free. I'm not going to download it again just to check.)
You CANNOT loose your dog because it got lose.
Spot the difference?












