I'm afraid that my dear wife may not know the difference between a fish and a phish. I have the anti-phishing capabilities of both IE (which she never uses) and Firefox enabled, however, I'm considering installing Comodo's or McKafee's site advisors and using one of them instead since they can graphically inform. This way, I could tell her to make sure "this" is green or whatever. Do you use either of these now and what is your opinion? If a site was fake, I'm sure Firefox's advisor would give a pretty graphic warning but is it as dependable as Comodo or McKafee? Thank You!
1
Opinions needed on anti-phishing protection!
Started by slowday444, Jul 23 2007 10:44 PM
3 replies to this topic
#2 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 2,952 posts
Cydonian Knight
- Gender:Male
- Location:England
Posted 24 July 2007 - 01:34 AM
McAfee Site Advisor is quite useful, dunno about Comodo.
#3 OFFLINE
-
- Moderators
-
- 8,858 posts
I hate computers
- Gender:Male
Posted 24 July 2007 - 04:00 AM
I would use site advisor.
#4 OFFLINE
-
- Members
-
- 1,626 posts
Lets Get Dangerous
- Gender:Male
- Location:QLD,Australia
- Interests:PC, LOTRO
Posted 25 July 2007 - 12:35 AM
Haven't used comodo, but I feel uncomfortable using a browser without site advisor.
fireryone
There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
There are 10 types of people in this world.
Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
