AMD or Intel
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 02:55 AM
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 03:43 AM
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:52 AM
as for AMD, forget about it.
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 06:05 AM
Intel graphics chip (which is not that fast). If you can wait a little while longer they will either have the Nvidias or ATIs.
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 03:35 PM
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 03:46 PM
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 03:53 PM
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:02 PM
How much did you pay?
All of these questions could lead to someone showing you a better deal.
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:06 PM
Intel seems to be a lot more money.. but from all I have researched, AMD seems to have a better "bang for the buck".
EDIT: If I were to get Intel, I would spend the extra money and get the highest upgrade they offer (2.0GHz) as I am with the AMD.
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:26 PM
Other companies I would look at if I were you are Toshiba(I have a toshiba and its a very solid, well built machine), HP, and IBM.
From what I've read Dell doesn't make bad laptops but they never looked as nice as these other ones.
Also what do you want to be able to do with this laptop? Is it a gaming machine or will it be mainly for MS office work?
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:28 PM
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:39 PM
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:42 PM
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:48 PM
http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Gateway-15-...roductDetail.do
Plus you get a printer, router, and Webroot security software.
I had a kick ass HP machine picked out(so awesome I almost took out my credit card.
It was about 150 more then what you have with dell though.
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 04:56 PM
I'll probably stick with the Dell, but if I decide to reconsider, I know where to look.
Also, for gaming.. it is clearly noted that AMD handles 3D applications better than Intel. The only downside I could find about AMD was shorter battery life, and it generates more heat.
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:01 PM
rridgely, on May 26 2007, 11:43 PM, said:
PENRYN -- FYI...lol
Intel's Penryn
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx, on May 27 2007, 12:56 PM, said:
I'll probably stick with the Dell, but if I decide to reconsider, I know where to look.
Also, for gaming.. it is clearly noted that AMD handles 3D applications better than Intel. The only downside I could find about AMD was shorter battery life, and it generates more heat.
Not sure where you found that fact... Intel = Best thing out there. Pair that with a good graphics chip and your good to go. Core 2 Duo's totally pwn AMD's, so don't even think about buying that AMD!
AJ
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:17 PM
The reason I say that is because they are onboard graphics meaning that like the intel ones they use system memory for graphics memory. The Intel ones are more compatible with vista from what I've read. (if you notice all of the highend laptops have that intel chip in them. Except for the really expensive ones that have the nvidia go chips)
If you want to do serious gaming on this thing your going to have to spend more money then this anyway. These systems are fast as hell but if gaming is your main aspect then you could get a much much faster desktop for this much money.
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:31 PM
It is for desktops, but I'm sure the laptop scene can't be far off.
If I find one for laptops, I'll post it.
Yes, the video card is a Radeon Xpress.
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:43 PM
xxxxsh4d0wxxxx, on May 27 2007, 12:06 PM, said:
Intel seems to be a lot more money.. but from all I have researched, AMD seems to have a better "bang for the buck".
EDIT: If I were to get Intel, I would spend the extra money and get the highest upgrade they offer (2.0GHz) as I am with the AMD.
My newest laptop is a 17 inch Dell Inspiron. It has 2 gig of ram and a 160 GB hard. My processor is a Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 (2.16 GHz). Other than the fact I had to argue with the clowns to make sure it didn't come preinstalled with junk I have been pretty happy with the Machine.
Why do you think the 2.0 GHz is the highest upgrade they offer? Mine is one up from the one you mentioned and there was another one up from that at 2.33 GHz. If I remember correctly there are 4 Intel Core 2 Duo processors for laptops and the one you mentioned was second from the bottom.
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 27 May 2007 - 05:46 PM
Check out Tom's Hardware for more current info.
Oh and that radeon xpress is worthless. The intel one is way better.












