Jump to content


Vista Home Basic on 512MB?


1 reply to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   Humpty

    Super Hero

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,125 posts

Posted 12 May 2007 - 11:07 AM

Must admit I have been posting a few anti Vista articles so I think it only fair to even things up as I haven't even tried it as yet.

Quote

Which is why I had steeled myself for pitiful performance when I yanked all but 512MB out of my test system last week and downgraded to Vista Home Basic. With a 2002–vintage CPU and Microsoft’s minimum recommended RAM, running the most basic of Vista retail editions on a 30GB partition, surely this would be a painful experience.

Or not.

You shouldn’t believe everything you read. I was expecting to need Valium and vodka and an on-call therapist to handle Vista Home Basic on this low-end system. Instead, I found a snappy, responsive OS that did everything I asked of it.

* The system booted two seconds faster than it had with all that extra RAM. On average, Vista’s boot time was less than 30 seconds.
* Menus popped up instantly, with no lag or delay.
* My favorite DVD, Blade Runner, played flawlessly at full resolution, in surround sound. (I had to install a DVD decoder first – Vista Home Basic doesn’t include DVD playback capabilities out of the box.)
* I was able to rip a CD, check my Google Mail account on Mozilla Thunderbird, and play a full-screen slide show, all at the same time, without a single skip or hiccup.
* Even installing Norton Antivirus 2007 couldn’t slow things down. The Norton software added 7 seconds to my startup time, but after it loaded, everything worked exactly as expected.
ZDnet Article

#2 OFFLINE   X2Core

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:United Kingdom

Posted 12 May 2007 - 07:31 PM

Vista Ultimate works wonders on mine, 512MB RAM, AMD 3000+.