davexnet Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 HI all, small XP partition, 80GB, 15GB free, about 20GB are "large files" (500MB to 2 GB) Defraggler was going through gyrations, but unable to move some of the files to the slow end of the drive. I opened iup task manager, defraggler using 95% CPU. I would say there was 2 or 3GB (perhaps in 4 or 5 extents) belonging to large files stuck in the start of the drive. Please consider this option. Have a best effort "move large files to the end of the drive" It doesn't really matter if large files are not in one extent. If it's in a few extents who cares? Doesn't affect the file performance. If Defraggler was programmed this way, it would have put ALL of my large file fragments in the slow part of the drive comfortably and quickly. Instead it ran for about an hour before I stopped it. It apperared to be "thinking", perhaps trying to figure out how to put ALL the files in one extent each? It's not necessary. Please consider my request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators mta Posted January 30, 2015 Moderators Share Posted January 30, 2015 have you seen the option in Settings, Options, Defrag tab, and tick Move large files to end of drive ? is this what you were after? Backup now & backup often.It's your digital life - protect it with a backup.Three things are certain; Birth, Death and loss of data. You control the last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davexnet Posted February 1, 2015 Author Share Posted February 1, 2015 Yes - this is what I'm referring to. It was ineffective for me, there was free space available, but not enough contiguous to move whole files into. As I said above, it looked as if Defraggler was "thinking" (99% cpu), but couldn't fgure out how best to proceed. My suggestion is to have a "best fit" option (related to move large files to end) that will allow the program to move the bigger files EVEN IF it can't get them into one extent. This would be a great addition to the program, the defrag process would take much less time. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now