Ccleaner Drive wiper
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 03 November 2010 - 05:02 AM
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 03 November 2010 - 05:46 AM
As this is a new feature the mechanics of this are not fully understood. Obviously an application running under Windows can't wipe the drive it's running on. Possibly it can do this on a non-system non-CC partition or drive. If you're fully confident that you can rebuild from scratch then you could try Drive Wiper and report back afterwards.
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 03 November 2010 - 05:46 PM
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explanation
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 05 November 2010 - 01:48 AM
mookey, on 03 November 2010 - 05:02 AM, said:
The new drive wiper utility does not erase everything on the entire boot drive (the drive which is running the operating system on it). But it will however, wipe everything on partitioned drive(s), flash drives, slave drives, and external drives. A very nice addition to the program.
There are other tools/programs out there that will create a boot disk which will wipe your entire main drive securely. It would be nice if ccleaner would include that type of utility in a future version.
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 05 November 2010 - 06:49 AM
http://www.piriform....free-disk-space
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 05 November 2010 - 09:49 AM
Can you or Mtntravel say:
On a non-system drive, is every file deleted, so you have to do a format to bring the drive/partition back to life?
On a system drive, what files are deleted, or left if that's easier? I can't grasp how that's done - is everything in Docs and Settings for all user profiles removed, or is it more sophisticated than that?
#7 OFFLINE
Posted 08 November 2010 - 12:12 PM
Augeas, on 05 November 2010 - 09:49 AM, said:
On a system drive, what files are deleted, or left if that's easier? I can't grasp how that's done - is everything in Docs and Settings for all user profiles removed, or is it more sophisticated than that?
You can't select Erase Drive for a system drive, but if you select Free Space only, this will not delete any files, just overwrite the free space. This is exactly the same feature in Advanced > Wipe Free Space.
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 10 November 2010 - 08:19 PM
MrRon, on 08 November 2010 - 12:12 PM, said:
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 10 November 2010 - 08:32 PM
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explanation
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 10 November 2010 - 09:07 PM
Nergal, on 10 November 2010 - 08:32 PM, said:
Nice to know what the warning/protection was, I wasn't about to risk hitting 'Wipe' just to see if there was a nice big warning message
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 11 November 2010 - 04:39 AM
ERASE is so much STRONGER - what could go wrong ! ! ! !
We know that people use Wipe Free Space because they think it increases the free space on their SSD.
We know that people use Gutman 35 pass because it is so much better than 1 pass, and they want their SSD to have the best treatment.
Instead of expecting the user to understand what is meant when he types ERASE,
it might be better if he was given a multi-choice question,
"What Benefit do you want from ERASE"
and only accept the correct answer.
Or of course they can learn the hard way.
Alan
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 11 November 2010 - 06:14 PM
JDPower, on 10 November 2010 - 09:07 PM, said:
Heh
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explanation
#13 OFFLINE
Posted 13 November 2010 - 10:57 PM
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 25 December 2011 - 09:02 AM
I started to use the wiper a few months ago just to see what was happening. It was taking away all my free space - after the wiping process is done, what type of free space can I expect on my hard drive?
Thanks.
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 27 December 2011 - 12:19 PM
DON'T JUST CLEAN EVERYTHING THAT'S CHECKED OFF.
Do your Registry Cleaning in small bits (at the very least Check-mark by Check-mark)
ALWAYS BACKUP THE ENTRY, YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT YOU'LL BREAK IF YOU DON'T.
CCLEANER, RECUVA, DEFRAGGLER AND SPECCY DOCUMENTATION CAN BE FOUND AT www.piriform.com/docs
Link to Winapp2.ini explanation
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:18 AM
I guess what Im asking is, does your method meet these requirements and can it wipe all data permanently?
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:29 AM
http://www.piriform....leaner-settings
http://www.piriform.com/docs
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 22 March 2012 - 10:52 AM
Edit:
Quick question here... I read this
"Note: CCleaner can only securely delete files which have not yet been deleted from the Recycle Bin. If you have already delete files insecurely (for example, using Windows Explorer), you can delete them securely using Recuva."
I haven't heard that the "Secure" erase using NSA or DoD standards didn't delete the items that were placed in the Recylcing bin during a systems use, so I should use Recuva after I run either NSA or DoD erase methods to ensure that no data from the bin was left behind?
Edited by Voxoptic, 22 March 2012 - 11:03 AM.
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 22 March 2012 - 03:48 PM
It is talking about secure file deletion, which is not the same as Wipe Free Space, and that's what this ancient thread is about. The quote is saying that CC will only securely delete files (i.e. overwrite files) that haven't already been deleted. It then suggests that to overwrite already deleted files you should use Recuva to select them and overwrite them. However CC's Wipe Free Space will do that, in bulk.
Perhaps the quote is left over from before WFS was implemented in CC. The reference to the recycler just confuses.
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:10 AM











