Newt Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 I understand that Windows XP requires at least 15% free on the drive to defragment using the defragmenter that comes with it. Does Defraggler have any similar constraints and if so what are they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willy2 Posted October 10, 2014 Share Posted October 10, 2014 Depends on what kind of defragmentation Defraggler must do. If you want to defragment the entire disk then more free space the better. If you only want to defragment the fragmented files then Defraggler needs less free space. System setup: http://speccy.piriform.com/results/gcNzIPEjEb0B2khOOBVCHPc A discussion always stimulates the braincells !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newt Posted October 11, 2014 Author Share Posted October 11, 2014 Thanks for clarifying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hav0c Posted October 16, 2014 Share Posted October 16, 2014 I understand that Windows XP requires at least 15% free on the drive to defragment using the defragmenter that comes with it. Does Defraggler have any similar constraints and if so what are they? If not mistaken Defraggler needs at least 10% free space for optimal defrag. Every line of code written by man can be undone by man . "A loser in the real world is still a loser in the net!" - .hack//SIGN . Getting old is inevitable, growing up is optional !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maki Posted November 3, 2014 Share Posted November 3, 2014 Excessive defragmentation is not recommended - because it will shorten the life of hard drives... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now